HomeCasesHarvey v. Torrent Leasing & U.S. Bank

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 86/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Harvey v. Torrent Leasing & U.S. Bank

D. Nevada · Dec 15, 2025

NV / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authority

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff included a fabricated/incorrect quotation attributed to Nesses v. Shepard; the court identified the quotation as fake. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared: False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff included a fabricated/incorrect quotation attributed to Nesses v. Shepard; the court identified the quotation as fake. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Flangas v. Perfekt Marketing' but the citation provided corresponded to Lawrence v. Clark County, indicating a miscitation or incorrect authority.
Why it matters now: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Nevada, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Why this matter is tracked

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff included a fabricated/incorrect quotation attributed to Nesses v. Shepard; the court identified the quotation as fake. Outcome: Warning.

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Nevada, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Record details

NevadaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Nevada

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateDec 15, 2025

AI toolChatGPT

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

ChatGPT is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff included a fabricated/incorrect quotation attributed to Nesses v. Shepard; the court identified the quotation as fake.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Flangas v. Perfekt Marketing' but the citation provided corresponded to Lawrence v. Clark County, indicating a miscitation or incorrect authority.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Harvey v. Torrent Leasing & U.S. Bank?: False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff included a fabricated/incorrect quotation attributed to Nesses v. Shepard; the court identified the quotation as fake. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Harvey v. Torrent Leasing & U.S. Bank matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Nevada, with the listed outcome: Warning.
What does the public record establish about Harvey v. Torrent Leasing & U.S. Bank?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Harvey v. Torrent Leasing & U.S. Bank summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Seeto v. KendallD. Nevada · May 5, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Edward C. Allen v. Western Governors University, et al.D. Nevada · Mar 31, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations James Fahey v. Wally’s Las Vegas, LLC, et al.D. Nevada · Dec 10, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Jackson v. United States DHSD. Nevada · Oct 1, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Saxena v. Martinez-Hernandez et al.D. Nevada · Feb 18, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Preston House v. TH Foods, Inc.D. Nevada · Jun 18, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff included a fabricated/incorrect quotation attributed to Nesses v. Shepard; the court identified the quotation as fake.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Flangas v. Perfekt Marketing' but the citation provided corresponded to Lawrence v. Clark County, indicating a miscitation or incorrect authority.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Harvey v. Torrent Leasing & U.S. Bank?

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff included a fabricated/incorrect quotation attributed to Nesses v. Shepard; the court identified the quotation as fake. Outcome: Warning.

Why does Harvey v. Torrent Leasing & U.S. Bank matter for legal AI risk?

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Nevada, with the listed outcome: Warning.

What does the public record establish about Harvey v. Torrent Leasing & U.S. Bank?

Which source supports this Harvey v. Torrent Leasing & U.S. Bank summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.