Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-1019ULSGenerated September 11, 2026Evidence checked Sep 11, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Azad Alamgir Kabir v. WebMD

D. New Jersey · Feb 3, 2026

Jurisdiction
federal
Court
D. New Jersey
Record ID
azad-alamgir-kabir-v-webmd-2026-02-03
Observed outcome
The court struck the plaintiff's filing and issued a formal warning regarding potential future sanctions.
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

The court struck the plaintiff's non-compliant filing and issued a formal warning. The judge explicitly cautioned that continued use of hallucinated citations or undisclosed generative AI in future submissions may result in a pre-filing injunction or other appropriate sanctions.

Why the decision-maker cared

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent case (Fairfield Indus. v. EP Energy); the court identified it as a hallucinated citation, treated it as invalid, and warned of possible sanctions for such citations.

Why it matters now

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. New Jersey, with the listed outcome: Struck filings; warning.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Pro Se
  • Fake Citations
  • Ip
  • Trial
  • Warning
  • Struck Filing
AI attribution
Implied
Recorded tool
unspecified
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
The matter came before the court on the pro se plaintiff's motions seeking to vacate prior orders, obtain direct CM/ECF filing access, and compel the docketing of submissions.
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

The court refers to the 'undisclosed use of generative artificial intelligence'.

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
  2. Escalate and correct a suspect filing promptly, with a documented response.