HomeCasesAzad Alamgir Kabir v. WebMD

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Azad Alamgir Kabir v. WebMD

D. New Jersey · Feb 3, 2026

NJ / federalEditorial impact: mediumpro sefake citationsiptrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent case (Fairfield Indus. v. EP Energy); the court identified it as a hallucinated citation, treated it as invalid, and warned of possible sanctions for such citations. Outcome: Struck filings; warning.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent case (Fairfield Indus. v. EP Energy); the court identified it as a hallucinated citation, treated it as invalid, and warned of possible sanctions for such citations.
Why it matters now: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. New Jersey, with the listed outcome: Struck filings; warning.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. New Jersey, with the listed outcome: Struck filings; warning.

Record details

New JerseySingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. New Jersey

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit3rd Circuit

DateFeb 3, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeStruck filings; warning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Struck filings; warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent case (Fairfield Indus. v. EP Energy); the court identified it as a hallucinated citation, treated it as invalid, and warned of possible sanctions for such citations.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Azad Alamgir Kabir v. WebMD?: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent case (Fairfield Indus. v. EP Energy); the court identified it as a hallucinated citation, treated it as invalid, and warned of possible sanctions for such citations. Outcome: Struck filings; warning.
Why does Azad Alamgir Kabir v. WebMD matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. New Jersey, with the listed outcome: Struck filings; warning.
What does the public record establish about Azad Alamgir Kabir v. WebMD?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Azad Alamgir Kabir v. WebMD summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Peterkin et al v. McIntyre et alD. New Jersey · Jun 26, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Zena L. Powell v. The Borough of BergenfieldD. New Jersey · May 12, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Baker v. Rastelli Foods LLCD. New Jersey · Mar 26, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Shaquan Pridgen v. Amazon.com Services LLCD. New Jersey · Mar 16, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Cesareo v. Port Authority of New York and New JerseyD. New Jersey · Dec 31, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Fantini v. WestRock Services, LLCD. New Jersey · Dec 19, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. New Jersey, with the listed outcome: Struck filings; warning.

Record details

New JerseySingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. New Jersey

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit3rd Circuit

DateFeb 3, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeStruck filings; warning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Questions this record answers

What happened in Azad Alamgir Kabir v. WebMD?

Why does Azad Alamgir Kabir v. WebMD matter for legal AI risk?

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. New Jersey, with the listed outcome: Struck filings; warning.

What does the public record establish about Azad Alamgir Kabir v. WebMD?

Which source supports this Azad Alamgir Kabir v. WebMD summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.