B… S… v. Ministre responsable de la Solidarité sociale et de l'Action communautaire
TAQ Québec · Nov 12, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- TAQ Québec
- Record ID
- b-s-v-ministre-responsable-de-la-solidarité-sociale-et-de-laction-communautaire-
- Observed outcome
- The Tribunal rejected the litigant's constitutional notice, declared the litigant foreclosed from filing further constitutional notices, and ruled that one of the four appeals was not validly formed.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The TAQ rejected a pro se litigant's constitutional notice and barred further filings of that type after finding the AI-generated submissions contained fabricated statutory text, references to repealed laws, and irrelevant legal provisions. The Tribunal concluded the filings were incoherent and failed to address the actual issues in the underlying administrative appeals.
False Quotes: Legal Norm | AI-generated notice presented text purporting to be article 55 of the LAPF and article 69 of its regulation that did not match the official statutory text; Tribunal found the presented text false. || Outdated Advice: Repealed Law | AI-generated filing attacked the constitutionality of article 42 of the LAPF, which had been abrogated in 2013; Tribunal noted the provision was no longer in force. || Misrepresented: Legal Norm | AI-generated notice enumerated numerous statutes and regulatory provisions (e.g., art. 17 of the Règlement sur l'aide aux personnes et aux familles; provisions of Loi sur le ministère de l'Emploi et de la Solidarité sociale) that do not apply to the contested decisions and lacked any explanation of how they infringe rights. || Misrepresented: Other | AI-generated materials contained numerous incoherences, contradictions and 'false information' across legislative and jurisprudential excerpts, undermining clarity and accuracy of the constitutional notice.
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in TAQ Québec, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fabricated Quotes
- Misrepresented Authority
- Administrative
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Admitted
- Recorded tool
- Unidentified
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- The Tribunal issued a decision on preliminary motions, specifically addressing the admissibility of a new appeal and a motion to reject the litigant's constitutional notice.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The litigant admitted to using AI for the documents.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Confirm that every authority actually supports the proposition for which it is offered.