Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Re X Corp.
BC Civil Resolution Tribunal · Sep 4, 2025
CanadaEditorial impact: lowpro sefabricated quotesmisrepresented authorityadministrative
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
False Quotes: Case Law | Reply included a block quote attributed to paragraph 150 of a cited case, but the case has only 124 paragraphs; the quoted passage does not exist and the court flagged it as false/misleading. Outcome: Claim for compensation dismissed due to false and misleading AI-assisted submissions.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether quotations and pincites accurately matched the cited source. The tracked outcome is Claim for compensation dismissed due to false and misleading AI-assisted submissions; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fabricated quotes involving Unidentified with Claim for compensation dismissed due to false and misleading AI-assisted submissions in BC Civil Resolution Tribunal, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
False Quotes: Case Law | Reply included a block quote attributed to paragraph 150 of a cited case, but the case has only 124 paragraphs; the quoted passage does not exist and the court flagged it as false/misleading. Outcome: Claim for compensation dismissed due to false and misleading AI-assisted submissions.
Operational lesson
This matter connects pro se and fabricated quotes involving Unidentified with Claim for compensation dismissed due to false and misleading AI-assisted submissions in BC Civil Resolution Tribunal, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
CourtBC Civil Resolution Tribunal
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateSep 4, 2025
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeClaim for compensation dismissed due to false and misleading AI-assisted submissions
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
not established
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Procedural posture
Claim for compensation dismissed due to false and misleading AI-assisted submissions
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Reply included a block quote attributed to paragraph 150 of a cited case, but the case has only 124 paragraphs; the quoted passage does not exist and the court flagged it as false/misleading.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Submissions cited the same case for legal propositions the case does not discuss; the court found these citations misleading or unsupported.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Re X Corp.?
- False Quotes: Case Law | Reply included a block quote attributed to paragraph 150 of a cited case, but the case has only 124 paragraphs; the quoted passage does not exist and the court flagged it as false/misleading. Outcome: Claim for compensation dismissed due to false and misleading AI-assisted submissions.
- Why does Re X Corp. matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fabricated quotes involving Unidentified with Claim for compensation dismissed due to false and misleading AI-assisted submissions in BC Civil Resolution Tribunal, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Re X Corp.?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Re X Corp. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.