Bohn v Construction Workers Union, CLAC Local 63
Alberta LRB · Sep 11, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- Alberta LRB
- Record ID
- bohn-v-construction-workers-union-clac-local-63-2026-09-11
- Observed outcome
- None Adjudicated
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | The Union reported that Mabbott’s submissions relied on authorities that appeared to be AI-generated and nonexistent, and that other legitimate authorities were misquoted or irrelevant. The Board noted that Mabbott provided incorrect and irrelevant case citations but did not identify or individually analyze them.
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Alberta LRB. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Employment
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record concerns a public allegation and does not establish an adjudicated finding. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Allegation status: no adjudicated finding is represented by this brief.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Keep allegations separate from adjudicated findings in research, reporting, and client communications.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.