Bohn v Construction Workers Union, CLAC Local 63
Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.
Alberta LRB · Sep 11, 2026
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | The Union reported that Mabbott’s submissions relied on authorities that appeared to be AI-generated and nonexistent, and that other legitimate authorities were misquoted or irrelevant. The Board noted that Mabbott provided incorrect and irrelevant case citations but did not identify or individually analyze them.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Alberta LRB. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | The Union reported that Mabbott’s submissions relied on authorities that appeared to be AI-generated and nonexistent, and that other legitimate authorities were misquoted or irrelevant. The Board noted that Mabbott provided incorrect and irrelevant case citations but did not identify or individually analyze them.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Alberta LRB. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | The Union reported that Mabbott’s submissions relied on authorities that appeared to be AI-generated and nonexistent, and that other legitimate authorities were misquoted or irrelevant. The Board noted that Mabbott provided incorrect and irrelevant case citations but did not identify or individually analyze them.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Bohn v Construction Workers Union, CLAC Local 63?
- Fabricated: Case Law | The Union reported that Mabbott’s submissions relied on authorities that appeared to be AI-generated and nonexistent, and that other legitimate authorities were misquoted or irrelevant. The Board noted that Mabbott provided incorrect and irrelevant case citations but did not identify or individually analyze them.
- Why does Bohn v Construction Workers Union, CLAC Local 63 matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Alberta LRB. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Bohn v Construction Workers Union, CLAC Local 63?
- The record concerns a public allegation and does not establish an adjudicated finding. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Bohn v Construction Workers Union, CLAC Local 63 summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.
This record comes from Canada. See Fictitious citations in Canadian courts for counts across the corpus and the court guidance on AI.
This record involves a self-represented party. See all pro se litigant AI hallucination decisions in the corpus, with counts by year, country and outcome.
Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases
One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.