Case n° 2512468
TA Grenoble · Dec 9, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- TA Grenoble
- Record ID
- case-n-2512468-2025-12-09
- Observed outcome
- The court rejected the petition for lack of jurisdiction.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court rejected the applicant's claims because they concerned criminal proceedings and judicial services, which fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of the judicial authority, not the administrative court. The court also noted the applicant's use of an unedited AI-generated document, which contained the raw exchange between the user and the AI tool.
The court reasoned that it lacked jurisdiction because the claims related to criminal proceedings and the conduct of judicial services, which are reserved for the judicial authority. The court further observed that the filings were confused and included unedited AI-generated dialogue.
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in TA Grenoble, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Administrative
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Explicitly Recorded
- Recorded tool
- Unidentified
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- The court issued an order (ordonnance) rejecting the petition for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to Article R. 222-1 of the Code of Administrative Justice.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The court refers to an unidentified AI tool.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Ensure all AI-generated content is thoroughly reviewed and edited by a human before filing.
- Verify the appropriate jurisdiction for a claim before filing to avoid summary dismissal.
- Remove all metadata, prompts, or raw AI-interaction logs from documents intended for court submission.