Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
M. D... A. c. Département de l'Isère
TA Grenoble · Jun 4, 2026
FranceEditorial impact: mediumpro sefake citationsmisrepresented authorityadministrative
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Requête et mémoires citaient des décisions juridictionnelles inexistantes; le tribunal relève qu'il s'agit de décisions non existantes et les rejette comme manifestement infondées. Outcome: Monetary Fine. The tribunal found the applicant's 300+ page filings to be manifestly generated with artificial intelligence, citing inapplicable statutory provisions and judicial decisions that do not exist. The court treated those submissions as manifestly unfounded and abusive and imposed a 200-euro fine under article R.741-12 CJA.…
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Monetary Fine; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Monetary Fine in TA Grenoble, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Requête et mémoires citaient des décisions juridictionnelles inexistantes; le tribunal relève qu'il s'agit de décisions non existantes et les rejette comme manifestement infondées. Outcome: Monetary Fine. The tribunal found the applicant's 300+ page filings to be manifestly generated with artificial intelligence, citing inapplicable statutory provisions and judicial decisions that do not exist. The court treated those submissions as manifestly unfounded and abusive and imposed a 200-euro fine under article R.741-12 CJA. The court's reasoning emphasized that the documents contained nonexistent jurisprudence and irrelevant or inapplicable legal texts, warranting rejection and a sanction for abuse of procedure.
Operational lesson
This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Monetary Fine in TA Grenoble, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
CourtTA Grenoble
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateJun 4, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeMonetary Fine
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Monetary Fine
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Requête et mémoires citaient des décisions juridictionnelles inexistantes; le tribunal relève qu'il s'agit de décisions non existantes et les rejette comme manifestement infondées.
- Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Les actes comportaient des textes légaux inapplicables et des normes présentées de manière erronée, apparemment générés par l'IA; le tribunal écarte ces arguments.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in M. D... A. c. Département de l'Isère?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Requête et mémoires citaient des décisions juridictionnelles inexistantes; le tribunal relève qu'il s'agit de décisions non existantes et les rejette comme manifestement infondées. Outcome: Monetary Fine. The tribunal found the applicant's 300+ page filings to be manifestly generated with artificial intelligence, citing inapplicable statutory provisions and judicial decisions that do not exist. The court treated those submissions as manifestly unfounded and abusive and imposed a 200-euro fine under article R.741-12 CJA.…
- Why does M. D... A. c. Département de l'Isère matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Monetary Fine in TA Grenoble, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about M. D... A. c. Département de l'Isère?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this M. D... A. c. Département de l'Isère summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.