Clifford v. Neidle et al.
D. Wyoming · Oct 28, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Court
- D. Wyoming
- Record ID
- clifford-v-neidle-et-al-2026-10-28
- Observed outcome
- Plaintiff’s filings and motion for alternative service were stricken; he was ordered to show cause why sanctions should not issue.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | The Court could not locate Newsome v. Penobscot, and reporter citation 391 F. App’x 783 corresponds to Matias v. Sears Home Improvement Products, Inc., an Eleventh Circuit employment-discrimination case. Outcome: Plaintiff’s filings and motion for alternative service were stricken; he was ordered to show cause why sanctions should not issue.. The Court found that Plaintiff’s filings contained multiple inaccurate or hallucinated legal citations, indicating possible improper use of artificial intelligence without adequate oversight. The Court struck the motion for alternative service and responses to the show-cause order, required Plaintiff to produce copies of two cited cases or explain under oath why he should not be sanctioned, and ordered further submissions regarding possible sanctions under Rule 11, 28 U.S.C. § 1927, and the Court’s inherent authority. No monetary or professional sanction was imposed in this order.
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Plaintiff’s filings and motion for alternative service were stricken; he was ordered to show cause why sanctions should not issue.. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Plaintiff’s filings and motion for alternative service were stricken; he was ordered to show cause why sanctions should not issue. in D. Wyoming. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Misrepresented Authority
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Plaintiff’s filings and motion for alternative service were stricken; he was ordered to show cause why sanctions should not issue.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.