Cole v. Lee
CA Illinois · Jul 30, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- State
- Court
- CA Illinois
- Record ID
- cole-v-lee-2026-07-30
- Observed outcome
- Brief struck and appeal dismissed (Illinois Supreme Court Rule 341 violations, including authorities that do not support the stated propositions and incorrect citations)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Misrepresented: Case Law | Cited Avery v. State Farm, 216 Ill. 2d 100 (2005) for the proposition that Consumer Fraud Act damages claims are legal claims triable to a jury; court found Avery contains no support for that proposition. Outcome: Brief struck and appeal dismissed (Illinois Supreme Court Rule 341 violations, including authorities that do not support the stated propositions and incorrect citations).
The structured public record identifies pro se and misrepresented authority and records Brief struck and appeal dismissed (Illinois Supreme Court Rule 341 violations, including authorities that do not support the stated propositions and incorrect citations). The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects pro se and misrepresented authority with Brief struck and appeal dismissed (Illinois Supreme Court Rule 341 violations, including authorities that do not support the stated propositions and incorrect citations) in CA Illinois. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Misrepresented Authority
- Landlord Tenant
- Appellate
- Struck Filing
- Case Dismissed
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- Unidentified
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Brief struck and appeal dismissed (Illinois Supreme Court Rule 341 violations, including authorities that do not support the stated propositions and incorrect citations)
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.