Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
P-Three Development, LLC v. Therm Flo, Inc.
CA Illinois · Jun 30, 2026
IL / stateEditorial impact: mediumpro sefake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authority
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
False Quotes: Case Law | Quoted Canon 2.15(c) language and claims about 'appropriate action' that are not found in the cited disciplinary opinion. Outcome: Brief Struck.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Brief Struck; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Brief Struck in CA Illinois, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
False Quotes: Case Law | Quoted Canon 2.15(c) language and claims about 'appropriate action' that are not found in the cited disciplinary opinion. Outcome: Brief Struck.
Operational lesson
This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Brief Struck in CA Illinois, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
IllinoisSingle-state evidence scope
CourtCA Illinois
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit7th Circuit
DateJun 30, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeBrief Struck
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Brief Struck
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
9 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Quoted Canon 2.15(c) language and claims about 'appropriate action' that are not found in the cited disciplinary opinion.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Cited as authority for intervention standards but does not exist; court could not locate the opinion.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Cited as a First District decision supporting intervention but is fictitious.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Cited as a published intervention case but does not exist per the court's research.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Attributed multiple intervention-related holdings and direct quotes that do not appear in the actual opinion.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Quoted as holding intervention principles and reversible error language that are not in the opinion.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Attributed several substantive holdings and quotes about intervention and timeliness that do not appear in the decision.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Quoted a proposition that the court found does not appear in the cited criminal decision (false quotation).
Show 1 additional discrepancies
- Fabricated: Case Law | Included in table of authorities as a 2018 First District opinion that the court could not locate.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in P-Three Development, LLC v. Therm Flo, Inc.?
- False Quotes: Case Law | Quoted Canon 2.15(c) language and claims about 'appropriate action' that are not found in the cited disciplinary opinion. Outcome: Brief Struck.
- Why does P-Three Development, LLC v. Therm Flo, Inc. matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Brief Struck in CA Illinois, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about P-Three Development, LLC v. Therm Flo, Inc.?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this P-Three Development, LLC v. Therm Flo, Inc. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.