Collins v. Nova Association Management Partners LLC
W.D. Washington · Jan 13, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- W.D. Washington
- Record ID
- collins-v-nova-association-management-partners-llc-2026-01-13
- Observed outcome
- The Court issued an Order to Show Cause requiring counsel to list and explain the non-existent and inaccurate citations, and ruled on the merits of the underlying motion to dismiss.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The Court issued an Order to Show Cause requiring Plaintiff's counsel to identify and explain the inclusion of non-existent and inaccurate legal citations in their opposition brief. This order was issued as a preliminary matter before the Court addressed the substantive merits of the defendants' motion to dismiss.
Fabricated: Case Law | Court found multiple non-existent legal citations incorporated in Plaintiff's opposition brief (Dkt. No. 53, cited on pages 5, 6, 8–10, 13) as pointed out by the moving defendants; Court ordered counsel to list and explain them. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Court noted inaccurate and inapt legal citations in the same brief (incorrect or miscited authorities); moving defendants highlighted these on reply and Court required counsel to explain how they appeared.
When OSC issues, produce a per-citation source log immediately; silence compounds the violation into sanctions.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Misrepresented Authority
- Contract
- Trial
- Ordered To Show Cause
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- The matter was before the Court on a renewed motion to dismiss. The Court granted the motion in part, denied it in part, and issued an Order to Show Cause regarding the Plaintiff's use of non-existent and inaccurate legal citations.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
- Retain a matter-level record of source checks and corrections.
- Assign a responsible reviewer for AI-assisted research and drafting.