HomeCasesCollins v. Nova Association Management Partners LLC

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Collins v. Nova Association Management Partners LLC

W.D. Washington · Jan 13, 2026

WA / federalEditorial impact: mediumfake citationsmisrepresented authoritycontracttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Court found multiple non-existent legal citations incorporated in Plaintiff's opposition brief (Dkt. No. 53, cited on pages 5, 6, 8–10, 13) as pointed out by the moving defendants; Court ordered counsel to list and explain them. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Court found multiple non-existent legal citations incorporated in Plaintiff's opposition brief (Dkt. No. 53, cited on pages 5, 6, 8–10, 13) as pointed out by the moving defendants; Court ordered counsel to list and explain them. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Court noted inaccurate and inapt legal citations in the same brief (incorrect or miscited authorities); moving defendants highlighted these on reply and Court required counsel to explain how they appeared.
Why it matters now: When OSC issues, produce a per-citation source log immediately; silence compounds the violation into sanctions.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

When OSC issues, produce a per-citation source log immediately; silence compounds the violation into sanctions.

Record details

WashingtonSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtW.D. Washington

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateJan 13, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeOrder to Show Cause

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Order to Show Cause

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Court found multiple non-existent legal citations incorporated in Plaintiff's opposition brief (Dkt. No. 53, cited on pages 5, 6, 8–10, 13) as pointed out by the moving defendants; Court ordered counsel to list and explain them.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Court noted inaccurate and inapt legal citations in the same brief (incorrect or miscited authorities); moving defendants highlighted these on reply and Court required counsel to explain how they appeared.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Collins v. Nova Association Management Partners LLC?: Fabricated: Case Law | Court found multiple non-existent legal citations incorporated in Plaintiff's opposition brief (Dkt. No. 53, cited on pages 5, 6, 8–10, 13) as pointed out by the moving defendants; Court ordered counsel to list and explain them. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.
Why does Collins v. Nova Association Management Partners LLC matter for legal AI risk?: When OSC issues, produce a per-citation source log immediately; silence compounds the violation into sanctions.
What does the public record establish about Collins v. Nova Association Management Partners LLC?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Collins v. Nova Association Management Partners LLC summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Ryan Adam Dixon v. MultiCare Health System (2)W.D. Washington · Mar 26, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Ryan Adam Dixon v. MultiCare Health System (1)W.D. Washington · Mar 4, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Valve Corporation v. Rothschild et al.W.D. Washington · Feb 9, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Ward v. Amazon.com Services LLCW.D. Washington · Apr 3, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Merz v. City of KalamaW.D. Washington · Feb 13, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Dana Serine Greene v. GSK PLCW.D. Washington · Jan 29, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

When OSC issues, produce a per-citation source log immediately; silence compounds the violation into sanctions.

Record details

WashingtonSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtW.D. Washington

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateJan 13, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeOrder to Show Cause

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Court noted inaccurate and inapt legal citations in the same brief (incorrect or miscited authorities); moving defendants highlighted these on reply and Court required counsel to explain how they appeared.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Collins v. Nova Association Management Partners LLC?

Why does Collins v. Nova Association Management Partners LLC matter for legal AI risk?

When OSC issues, produce a per-citation source log immediately; silence compounds the violation into sanctions.

What does the public record establish about Collins v. Nova Association Management Partners LLC?

Which source supports this Collins v. Nova Association Management Partners LLC summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.