Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-1E9ZRXCGenerated October 26, 2026Evidence checked Oct 25, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Condominium v. Lati Initiation and Construction Ltd

Israel · Mar 17, 2025

Jurisdiction
international
Court
Israel
Record ID
condominium-v-lati-initiation-and-construction-ltd-2025-03-17
Observed outcome
Case dismissed
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

The March 17, 2025 Israeli Condominium v. Lati Initiation and Construction Ltd listing records three fake citations in a filing. The incident ended with dismissal of the case and a 1,000 ILS monetary consequence. The public tracker does not identify the litigants or an AI product, so the summary should not infer a tool, a judge, or additional facts about the underlying construction dispute.

Why the decision-maker cared

The linked record identifies trial and records Case dismissed. This page does not infer judicial reasoning beyond the source.

Why it matters now

Israeli courts are imposing nominal costs orders on AI-tainted filings even in low-value disputes.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Trial
  • Monetary
  • Case Dismissed
AI attribution
Not Established
Recorded tool
No tool named in source
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Case dismissed
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Latest evidence review: Metadata Only (medium confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Escalate unresolved verification failures before filing and preserve the responsible reviewer's signoff record.
  2. Apply the same source-checking controls to AI (implied, unspecified) output as to any other research input.
  3. Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.