Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-0E3OSN2Generated September 10, 2026Evidence checked Sep 10, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Corst v. Mushailov

CC New York · Jan 15, 2026

Jurisdiction
state
Court
CC New York
Record ID
corst-v-mushailov-2026-01-15
Observed outcome
The court disregarded the plaintiff's defective legal arguments and granted the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction; counsel provided a formal apology.
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

The court identified multiple fabricated and misrepresented case citations in the plaintiff's filings, which it attributed to the use of an AI program. Counsel apologized to the court, admitting to a failure to properly review the submissions. The court disregarded the defective legal arguments and granted the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint.

Why the decision-maker cared

Fabricated: Case Law | Citation “Matter of Knapp v Knapp, 225 AD2d 1010 (4th Dept 1996)” could not be located under that name and instead led to a different matter (Orange Steel Erectors v Newburgh Steel Products Inc.); court found it defective/unverified. || Fabricated: Case Law | Citation “Matter of Negron v St. Charles Hosp. & Rehab. Ctr., 121 AD3d 1427 (2d Dept 2014)” led to a different matter (People v Rojas) and did not support counsel's argument; court could not find the cited matter. || Fabricated: Case Law | Citation “Matter of Polizzi v Polizzi, 226 AD2d 581 (2d Dept 1996)” did not correspond to that matter and led to a different case (Epes v Healey); court found it defective/unverified. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Citation “Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Estwick, 160 AD3d 911 (2d Dept 2018)” exists but the opinion does not support the proposition asserted by counsel; misrepresentation of precedent.

Why it matters now

This record documents a Lawyer filing issue in CC New York, with the listed outcome: Apology from Counsel.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Fabricated_case_law
  • Misrepresented_precedent
  • Lack_of_human_oversight
  • Fake Citations
  • Misrepresented Authority
  • Contract
AI attribution
Implied
Recorded tool
AI (unspecified)
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
The court addressed the merits of a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction after previously granting a default judgment that was later vacated.
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

Court noted citations appeared to be generated by an AI program.

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
  2. Confirm that every authority actually supports the proposition for which it is offered.