HomeCasesCorst v. Mushailov

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Corst v. Mushailov

CC New York · Jan 15, 2026

NY / stateEditorial impact: lowfake citationsmisrepresented authoritycontracttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Citation “Matter of Knapp v Knapp, 225 AD2d 1010 (4th Dept 1996)” could not be located under that name and instead led to a different matter (Orange Steel Erectors v Newburgh Steel Products Inc.); court found it defective/unverified. Outcome: Apology from Counsel.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Citation “Matter of Knapp v Knapp, 225 AD2d 1010 (4th Dept 1996)” could not be located under that name and instead led to a different matter (Orange Steel Erectors v Newburgh Steel Products Inc.); court found it defective/unverified. || Fabricated: Case Law | Citation “Matter of Negron v St. Charles Hosp. & Rehab. Ctr., 121 AD3d 1427 (2d Dept 2014)” led to a different matter (People v Rojas) and did not support counsel's argument; court could not find the cited matter. || Fabricated: Case Law | Citation “Matter of Polizzi v Polizzi, 226 AD2d 581 (2d Dept 1996)” did not correspond to that matter and led to a different case (Epes v Healey); court found it defective/unverified. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Citation “Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Estwick, 160 AD3d 911 (2d Dept 2018)” exists but the opinion does not support the proposition asserted by counsel; misrepresentation of precedent.
Why it matters now: This record documents a Lawyer filing issue in CC New York, with the listed outcome: Apology from Counsel.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Lawyer filing issue in CC New York, with the listed outcome: Apology from Counsel.

Record details

New YorkSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtCC New York

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit2nd Circuit

DateJan 15, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeApology from Counsel

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Apology from Counsel

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Citation “Matter of Knapp v Knapp, 225 AD2d 1010 (4th Dept 1996)” could not be located under that name and instead led to a different matter (Orange Steel Erectors v Newburgh Steel Products Inc.); court found it defective/unverified.
Fabricated: Case Law | Citation “Matter of Negron v St. Charles Hosp. & Rehab. Ctr., 121 AD3d 1427 (2d Dept 2014)” led to a different matter (People v Rojas) and did not support counsel's argument; court could not find the cited matter.
Fabricated: Case Law | Citation “Matter of Polizzi v Polizzi, 226 AD2d 581 (2d Dept 1996)” did not correspond to that matter and led to a different case (Epes v Healey); court found it defective/unverified.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Citation “Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Estwick, 160 AD3d 911 (2d Dept 2018)” exists but the opinion does not support the proposition asserted by counsel; misrepresentation of precedent.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Corst v. Mushailov?: Fabricated: Case Law | Citation “Matter of Knapp v Knapp, 225 AD2d 1010 (4th Dept 1996)” could not be located under that name and instead led to a different matter (Orange Steel Erectors v Newburgh Steel Products Inc.); court found it defective/unverified. Outcome: Apology from Counsel.
Why does Corst v. Mushailov matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Lawyer filing issue in CC New York, with the listed outcome: Apology from Counsel.
What does the public record establish about Corst v. Mushailov?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Corst v. Mushailov summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

H.F. v. StateCC New York · Feb 10, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Matter of SamuelCC New York · Jan 11, 2024same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Sharei Torah v. HendelSC New York · Jun 1, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + misrepresented authority Sana Hazina Butler v. Fidelity Management & Research Company LLCS.D. New York · Apr 30, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + misrepresented authority Kleyman Law Group, P.C. v. James KaloidisSC New York · Apr 3, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + misrepresented authority Burlingame v. Argo Private Client Group, Ltd. et al.S.D. New York · Dec 17, 2025same jurisdiction · fake citations + misrepresented authority

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Lawyer filing issue in CC New York, with the listed outcome: Apology from Counsel.

Record details

New YorkSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtCC New York

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit2nd Circuit

DateJan 15, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeApology from Counsel

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Citation “Matter of Negron v St. Charles Hosp. & Rehab. Ctr., 121 AD3d 1427 (2d Dept 2014)” led to a different matter (People v Rojas) and did not support counsel's argument; court could not find the cited matter.

Fabricated: Case Law | Citation “Matter of Polizzi v Polizzi, 226 AD2d 581 (2d Dept 1996)” did not correspond to that matter and led to a different case (Epes v Healey); court found it defective/unverified.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Citation “Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Estwick, 160 AD3d 911 (2d Dept 2018)” exists but the opinion does not support the proposition asserted by counsel; misrepresentation of precedent.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Corst v. Mushailov?

Why does Corst v. Mushailov matter for legal AI risk?

This record documents a Lawyer filing issue in CC New York, with the listed outcome: Apology from Counsel.

What does the public record establish about Corst v. Mushailov?

Which source supports this Corst v. Mushailov summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.