Credit One Finance Limited v Cheung Yiu Cho & another
District Court · Mar 20, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- District Court
- Record ID
- credit-one-finance-limited-v-cheung-yiu-cho-another-2026-03-20
- Observed outcome
- Adverse Costs Order
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
False Quotes: Case Law | D2 attributed an estoppel proposition to paragraph 58 of Lam Ka Kui v Choi Yuen Ling, but the cited paragraph contains a discussion of the plaintiff’s opportunity to have a power of attorney prepared and does not state the quoted proposition. Outcome: Adverse Costs Order.
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Adverse Costs Order. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Adverse Costs Order in District Court. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Misrepresented Authority
- Trial
- Monetary
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- Unidentified
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Adverse Costs Order
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.