Krystal Faye Potterf, et al. v. Drew F. Wessels, et al.
E.D. Michigan · Aug 26, 2026
What happened in this matter?
False Quotes: Case Law | Quoted a purported Supreme Court statement attributed to United States v. Sineneng-Smith that does not appear in the opinion. Outcome: Warning.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Warning. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning in E.D. Michigan. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
False Quotes: Case Law | Quoted a purported Supreme Court statement attributed to United States v. Sineneng-Smith that does not appear in the opinion. Outcome: Warning.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning in E.D. Michigan. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Warning
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
5 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Quoted a purported Supreme Court statement attributed to United States v. Sineneng-Smith that does not appear in the opinion.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Cited a non-existent Sixth Circuit opinion United States v. Abdi at 827 F.3d 533 for a docket-management proposition.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Listed Hill v. Synder, 814 F.3d 408 (6th Cir. 2016) in index of authorities though the court could not locate such a decision.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Cited Ability Center of Greater Toledo v. City of Sandusky for a proposition about cognitive/communicative accommodations that the case does not support.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Asserted Tindall v. Wayne County Friend of the Court supports an exception to Younger abstention when it actually held Younger abstention was required.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Krystal Faye Potterf, et al. v. Drew F. Wessels, et al.?
- False Quotes: Case Law | Quoted a purported Supreme Court statement attributed to United States v. Sineneng-Smith that does not appear in the opinion. Outcome: Warning.
- Why does Krystal Faye Potterf, et al. v. Drew F. Wessels, et al. matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning in E.D. Michigan. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Krystal Faye Potterf, et al. v. Drew F. Wessels, et al.?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Krystal Faye Potterf, et al. v. Drew F. Wessels, et al. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.