David Martin v. ODS Community Dental Insurance et al.
D. Oregon · Feb 18, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- D. Oregon
- Record ID
- david-martin-v-ods-community-dental-insurance-et-al-2026-02-18
- Observed outcome
- Motion for temporary restraining order denied; formal warning issued to pro se litigant regarding citation accuracy.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court denied the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and issued a formal warning regarding the submission of inaccurate or incomplete legal citations, specifically noting the potential use of generative AI in the plaintiff's filings.
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributes a quote to Zschernig v. Miller (citing 389 U.S. 429, 432) that the court found does not appear on the cited page or anywhere in the case. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cites Hartman v. Moore, Estelle v. Gamble, and Washington v. Glucksberg in rhymed verse and without full or supporting citations; the court found these citations inaccurate or incomplete.
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Oregon, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fabricated Quotes
- Misrepresented Authority
- Tort
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Implied
- Recorded tool
- Generative artificial intelligence (unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Order denying plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The court referenced the plaintiff's potential use of generative AI.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Confirm that every authority actually supports the proposition for which it is offered.