HomeCasesDavid Martin v. ODS Community Dental Insurance et al.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 76/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

David Martin v. ODS Community Dental Insurance et al.

D. Oregon · Feb 18, 2026

OR / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefabricated quotesmisrepresented authoritytort

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributes a quote to Zschernig v. Miller (citing 389 U.S. 429, 432) that the court found does not appear on the cited page or anywhere in the case.

Why the court cared: False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributes a quote to Zschernig v. Miller (citing 389 U.S. 429, 432) that the court found does not appear on the cited page or anywhere in the case. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cites Hartman v. Moore, Estelle v. Gamble, and Washington v. Glucksberg in rhymed verse and without full or supporting citations; the court found these citations inaccurate or incomplete.
Why it matters now: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Oregon, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

Why this matter is tracked

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributes a quote to Zschernig v. Miller (citing 389 U.S. 429, 432) that the court found does not appear on the cited page or anywhere in the case.

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Oregon, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

Record details

OregonSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Oregon

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateFeb 18, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributes a quote to Zschernig v. Miller (citing 389 U.S. 429, 432) that the court found does not appear on the cited page or anywhere in the case.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cites Hartman v. Moore, Estelle v. Gamble, and Washington v. Glucksberg in rhymed verse and without full or supporting citations; the court found these citations inaccurate or incomplete.

Questions this record answers

What happened in David Martin v. ODS Community Dental Insurance et al.?: False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributes a quote to Zschernig v. Miller (citing 389 U.S. 429, 432) that the court found does not appear on the cited page or anywhere in the case.
Why does David Martin v. ODS Community Dental Insurance et al. matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Oregon, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
What does the public record establish about David Martin v. ODS Community Dental Insurance et al.?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this David Martin v. ODS Community Dental Insurance et al. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Troy Allen Berg v. Mandi Marie WondraD. Oregon · Dec 12, 2025same court · pro se + fabricated quotes Couvrette v. WisnovskyD. Oregon · Mar 23, 2026same court · fabricated quotes + misrepresented authority Michael J. Cross v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al.D. Oregon · Jun 29, 2026same court · pro se + trial Steven Nemec v. Kelsey Kanoelani Alao and Alyssa Jade AlaoD. Oregon · Apr 10, 2026same court · pro se + trial Yves Hector Vimegnon v. Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc.D. Oregon · Mar 30, 2026same court · pro se + trial Stafford v. Andrew Taffet, et al.D. Oregon · Mar 23, 2026same court · pro se + trial

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributes a quote to Zschernig v. Miller (citing 389 U.S. 429, 432) that the court found does not appear on the cited page or anywhere in the case.

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Oregon, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

Record details

OregonSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Oregon

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateFeb 18, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributes a quote to Zschernig v. Miller (citing 389 U.S. 429, 432) that the court found does not appear on the cited page or anywhere in the case.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cites Hartman v. Moore, Estelle v. Gamble, and Washington v. Glucksberg in rhymed verse and without full or supporting citations; the court found these citations inaccurate or incomplete.

Questions this record answers

What happened in David Martin v. ODS Community Dental Insurance et al.?

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributes a quote to Zschernig v. Miller (citing 389 U.S. 429, 432) that the court found does not appear on the cited page or anywhere in the case.

Why does David Martin v. ODS Community Dental Insurance et al. matter for legal AI risk?

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Oregon, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

What does the public record establish about David Martin v. ODS Community Dental Insurance et al.?

Which source supports this David Martin v. ODS Community Dental Insurance et al. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.