Fatih Gazioğlu v. KKTC Başsavcısı
Yargıtay/Asli Yetki · Jan 22, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- Yargıtay/Asli Yetki
- Record ID
- fatih-gazioglu-v-kktc-bassavc-s-2026-01-22
- Observed outcome
- Leave to apply for certiorari and prohibition granted; stay of proceedings denied.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court granted the applicant leave to apply for certiorari and prohibition, finding that the allegations regarding the unauthorized amendment of a judgment and the reliance on non-existent or non-evidentiary sources presented an arguable point. The court did not make a final finding on the truth of these allegations, deferring the substantive review to a panel.
Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | Applicant alleges the lower court's judgment contains non-existent or 'made-up' scientific authorities and academic citations relied on in reasoning (not produced at trial). || Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant alleges the lower court added or relied upon legal/precedential authorities or case citations in the judgment that were not part of the trial record and may be non-existent.
This record documents a Judge filing issue in Yargıtay/Asli Yetki, with the listed outcome: Leave to apply for certiorari/prohibition granted.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fabricated Legal Authorities
- Fabricated Scientific Authorities
- Unauthorized Amendment Of Judicial Record
- Fake Citations
- Criminal
- Trial
- AI attribution
- Implied
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Leave to apply for certiorari and prohibition granted; stay of proceedings denied.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The applicant alleged the court used non-existent scientific and legal sources.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Allegation status: no adjudicated finding is represented by this brief.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.