United States of America v. Smith
Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.
N.D. Illinois · Aug 7, 2026
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Court could not locate or verify the cited case; petitioner relied on this citation to support his §2C1.1 argument. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Order to Show Cause. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Order to Show Cause in N.D. Illinois. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Court could not locate or verify the cited case; petitioner relied on this citation to support his §2C1.1 argument. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Order to Show Cause in N.D. Illinois. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Order to Show Cause
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
8 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Court could not find the purported case relied on by petitioner in briefing.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Petitioner attributed a holding to Jones that would have required resentencing; Court found the case real but mischaracterized (Jones affirmed the sentence).
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Petitioner said Scott supported a cumulative-effect ineffective-assistance argument; Court found Scott did not contain that discussion.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Court unable to locate the cited Rivera decision and URL led nowhere; citation unsupported.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Petitioner cited Aviles-Colon as reversing for misrepresentation of loss amount; Court noted Aviles-Colon was a remand in a Brady context and did not support petitioner's asserted point.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Court could not locate the cited Johnson decision petitioner relied on for the proposition that prosecutorial exaggeration is improper.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Court could not locate or verify the cited case; petitioner relied on this citation to support his §2C1.1 argument.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Court could not locate the cited decision that petitioner attributed supporting his sentencing argument.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in United States of America v. Smith?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Court could not locate or verify the cited case; petitioner relied on this citation to support his §2C1.1 argument. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.
- Why does United States of America v. Smith matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Order to Show Cause in N.D. Illinois. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about United States of America v. Smith?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this United States of America v. Smith summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases
One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.