Femhealth USA Carafem v. Rickey Nelson Williams
M.D. Tennessee · Jan 23, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- M.D. Tennessee
- Record ID
- femhealth-usa-carafem-v-rickey-nelson-williams-2026-01-23
- Observed outcome
- Arguments based on fabricated authority were struck; the court issued a warning regarding potential future sanctions; the plaintiff's motion for statutory damages was granted.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court struck the defendants' arguments based on fabricated authority and issued a formal warning that future citations to nonexistent case law could result in sanctions. The court did not impose monetary sanctions at this time but granted the plaintiff's underlying motion for statutory damages.
Fabricated: Legal Norm | Defendants included fabricated statutory language in their response; the Court identified it as fabricated, struck those portions, and refused to consider them. || Fabricated: Case Law | Defendants quoted nonexistent cases (fabricated case law) in support of denying statutory damages; the Court found the quotations were from nonexistent cases, struck them, and warned sanctions could follow.
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Tennessee, with the listed outcome: Arguments Struck; Warning.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Civil Rights
- Trial
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Post-summary judgment motion for an award of statutory damages.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
- Confirm that every authority actually supports the proposition for which it is offered.
- Escalate and correct a suspect filing promptly, with a documented response.