HomeCasesJeremie Montgomery v. AFL-CIO

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 80/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Jeremie Montgomery v. AFL-CIO

M.D. Tennessee · Nov 14, 2025

TN / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsemploymenttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'EEOC v. Ironworkers Local 28, 2012 WL 4339035 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)' as supporting authority; court stated the citation was incorrect and not located. See beginning of judgment: "Editor's Note: This decision contains discussion of citation references that are incorrect or do not actually exist. These invalid citations appeared in the original court opinion and have been preserved as written since they are part of the official record. Any links to these invalid citations have been removed."

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'EEOC v. Ironworkers Local 28, 2012 WL 4339035 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)' as supporting authority; court stated the citation was incorrect and not located. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Operating Engineers Local 406 JATC, 271 NLRB 1396 (1984)' to support union liability; court found citation incorrect/non-existent and could not locate the case. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'IBEW Local 212 (Cincinnati JATC), 331 NLRB 152 (2000)' to argue JATC liability; court determined the citation was incorrect/non-existent.
Why it matters now: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Tennessee, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Tennessee, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

Record details

TennesseeSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtM.D. Tennessee

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit6th Circuit

DateNov 14, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'EEOC v. Ironworkers Local 28, 2012 WL 4339035 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)' as supporting authority; court stated the citation was incorrect and not located.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Operating Engineers Local 406 JATC, 271 NLRB 1396 (1984)' to support union liability; court found citation incorrect/non-existent and could not locate the case.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'IBEW Local 212 (Cincinnati JATC), 331 NLRB 152 (2000)' to argue JATC liability; court determined the citation was incorrect/non-existent.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Jeremie Montgomery v. AFL-CIO?: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'EEOC v. Ironworkers Local 28, 2012 WL 4339035 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)' as supporting authority; court stated the citation was incorrect and not located. See beginning of judgment: "Editor's Note: This decision contains discussion of citation references that are incorrect or do not actually exist. These invalid citations appeared in the original court opinion and have been preserved as written since they are part of the official record. Any links to these invalid citations have been removed."
Why does Jeremie Montgomery v. AFL-CIO matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Tennessee, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
What does the public record establish about Jeremie Montgomery v. AFL-CIO?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Jeremie Montgomery v. AFL-CIO summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Femhealth USA Carafem v. Rickey Nelson WilliamsM.D. Tennessee · Jan 23, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Edward Reynolds v. Progressive Technologies, Inc.W.D. Tennessee · Mar 30, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations Pate v. CMG Mortgage, Inc., et al.E.D. Tennessee · Apr 28, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations Jamison Warfield v. W.N. Morehouse Truck Line, Inc.E.D. Tennessee · Nov 6, 2025same jurisdiction · fake citations + employment John Hurt v. Ampcus, Inc.E.D. Texas · Jul 8, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Adrienne Hankins v. Dentons US LLP, et al.N.D. California · Jun 22, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Tennessee, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

Record details

TennesseeSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtM.D. Tennessee

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit6th Circuit

DateNov 14, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'EEOC v. Ironworkers Local 28, 2012 WL 4339035 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)' as supporting authority; court stated the citation was incorrect and not located.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Operating Engineers Local 406 JATC, 271 NLRB 1396 (1984)' to support union liability; court found citation incorrect/non-existent and could not locate the case.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'IBEW Local 212 (Cincinnati JATC), 331 NLRB 152 (2000)' to argue JATC liability; court determined the citation was incorrect/non-existent.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Jeremie Montgomery v. AFL-CIO?

Why does Jeremie Montgomery v. AFL-CIO matter for legal AI risk?

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Tennessee, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

What does the public record establish about Jeremie Montgomery v. AFL-CIO?

Which source supports this Jeremie Montgomery v. AFL-CIO summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.