AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Sep 10, 2026 · Latest decision Sep 8, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesJeremie Montgomery v. AFL-CIO
Evidence review: primary document verified. The linked primary document was extracted and checked with page-level evidence locators.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 80/100. It passes the current publication gate; that is not a legal-editorial review or a guarantee that every field has been independently verified.
Corpus matter record

Jeremie Montgomery v. AFL-CIO

M.D. Tennessee · Nov 14, 2025

TN / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsemploymenttrialNone Adjudicated
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

The court identified that the pro se plaintiff submitted multiple fabricated legal citations in his filings. The court explicitly addressed these non-existent cases in its memorandum, noting that the citations were incorrect or could not be located, and preserved them in the official record while clarifying their invalidity.

Why the court cared
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'EEOC v. Ironworkers Local 28, 2012 WL 4339035 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)' as supporting authority; court stated the citation was incorrect and not located. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Operating Engineers Local 406 JATC, 271 NLRB 1396 (1984)' to support union liability; court found citation incorrect/non-existent and could not locate the case. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'IBEW Local 212 (Cincinnati JATC), 331 NLRB 152 (2000)' to argue JATC liability; court determined the citation was incorrect/non-existent.
Why it matters now
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Tennessee, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'EEOC v. Ironworkers Local 28, 2012 WL 4339035 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)' as supporting authority; court stated the citation was incorrect and not located. See beginning of judgment: "Editor's Note: This decision contains discussion of citation references that are incorrect or do not actually exist. These invalid citations appeared in the original court opinion and have been preserved as written since they are part of the official record. Any links to these invalid citations have been removed."

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Tennessee, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

Record details

TennesseeSingle-state evidence scope
Explore TNOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtM.D. Tennessee
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit6th Circuit
DateNov 14, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeThe court granted summary judgment in favor of both defendants, dismissing the plaintiff's claims of race discrimination and retaliation.
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

The court record implies the use of external research tools by the pro se litigant.

Procedural posture

The court reviewed a Magistrate Judge's Report & Recommendation (R&R) regarding cross-motions for summary judgment. The court overruled the plaintiff's objections, sustained the defendant's partial objection, and granted summary judgment for both defendants.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'EEOC v. Ironworkers Local 28, 2012 WL 4339035 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)' as supporting authority; court stated the citation was incorrect and not located.
  2. Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Operating Engineers Local 406 JATC, 271 NLRB 1396 (1984)' to support union liability; court found citation incorrect/non-existent and could not locate the case.
  3. Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'IBEW Local 212 (Cincinnati JATC), 331 NLRB 152 (2000)' to argue JATC liability; court determined the citation was incorrect/non-existent.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Jeremie Montgomery v. AFL-CIO?
The court identified that the pro se plaintiff submitted multiple fabricated legal citations in his filings. The court explicitly addressed these non-existent cases in its memorandum, noting that the citations were incorrect or could not be located, and preserved them in the official record while clarifying their invalidity.
Why does Jeremie Montgomery v. AFL-CIO matter for legal AI risk?
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Tennessee, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
What does the public record establish about Jeremie Montgomery v. AFL-CIO?
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Jeremie Montgomery v. AFL-CIO summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Femhealth USA Carafem v. Rickey Nelson WilliamsM.D. Tennessee · Jan 23, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsEdward Reynolds v. Progressive Technologies, Inc.W.D. Tennessee · Mar 30, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citationsIn re BFI Waste Sys. of Tenn.M.D. Tennessee · Aug 6, 2026same court · fake citations + trialPate v. CMG Mortgage, Inc., et al.E.D. Tennessee · Apr 28, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citationsJamison Warfield v. W.N. Morehouse Truck Line, Inc.E.D. Tennessee · Nov 6, 2025same jurisdiction · fake citations + employmentSantos v. Hoboken Public School District, et al.D. New Jersey · Sep 3, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)