G.P. v. Jose Hernandez Arevalo
W.D. Washington · Sep 8, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- W.D. Washington
- Record ID
- g-p-v-jose-hernandez-arevalo-2026-09-08
- Observed outcome
- The court noted the fabricated citation and declined to impose sanctions at that time.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited a nonexistent federal case as authority; the error was identified by Turo and acknowledged by G.P., who replaced it with a California Court of Appeal decision. The court referred to the authority as apparently fabricated and did not impose sanctions. Outcome: The court noted the fabricated citation and declined to impose sanctions at that time.. G.P.’s opposition brief contained an apparently AI-fabricated citation to the nonexistent case Kader v. S. Fla. Maint., Inc., No. 22-cv-23224, 2023 WL 3578798 (S.D. Fla. May 22, 2023). Turo identified the error, and G.P.’s counsel did not dispute it, acknowledging the citation and replacing it with a California Court of Appeal decision. The court stated that the fabricated authority, together with repeated and unexcused missed deadlines, fell below the required standard of professional responsibility, but imposed no sanctions given the procedural posture.
The structured public record identifies fake citations and trial and records The court noted the fabricated citation and declined to impose sanctions at that time.. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fake citations and trial with The court noted the fabricated citation and declined to impose sanctions at that time. in W.D. Washington. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- The court noted the fabricated citation and declined to impose sanctions at that time.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.