G.P. v. Jose Hernandez Arevalo
W.D. Washington · Sep 8, 2026
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited a nonexistent federal case as authority; the error was identified by Turo and acknowledged by G.P., who replaced it with a California Court of Appeal decision. The court referred to the authority as apparently fabricated and did not impose sanctions. Outcome: The court noted the fabricated citation and declined to impose sanctions at that time.. G.P.’s opposition brief contained an apparently AI-fabricated citation to the nonexistent case Kader v. S. Fla. Maint., Inc., No. 22-cv-23224, 2023 WL 3578798 (S.D. Fla. May 22, 2023). Turo identified the error, and G.P.’s counsel did not dispute it, acknowledging the citation and replacing it with a California Court of Appeal decision. The court stated that the fabricated authority, together with repeated and unexcused missed deadlines, fell below the required standard of professional responsibility, but imposed no sanctions given the procedural posture.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies fake citations and trial and records The court noted the fabricated citation and declined to impose sanctions at that time.. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fake citations and trial with The court noted the fabricated citation and declined to impose sanctions at that time. in W.D. Washington. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited a nonexistent federal case as authority; the error was identified by Turo and acknowledged by G.P., who replaced it with a California Court of Appeal decision. The court referred to the authority as apparently fabricated and did not impose sanctions. Outcome: The court noted the fabricated citation and declined to impose sanctions at that time.. G.P.’s opposition brief contained an apparently AI-fabricated citation to the nonexistent case Kader v. S. Fla. Maint., Inc., No. 22-cv-23224, 2023 WL 3578798 (S.D. Fla. May 22, 2023). Turo identified the error, and G.P.’s counsel did not dispute it, acknowledging the citation and replacing it with a California Court of Appeal decision. The court stated that the fabricated authority, together with repeated and unexcused missed deadlines, fell below the required standard of professional responsibility, but imposed no sanctions given the procedural posture.
This matter connects fake citations and trial with The court noted the fabricated citation and declined to impose sanctions at that time. in W.D. Washington. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The court noted the fabricated citation and declined to impose sanctions at that time.
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited a nonexistent federal case as authority; the error was identified by Turo and acknowledged by G.P., who replaced it with a California Court of Appeal decision. The court referred to the authority as apparently fabricated and did not impose sanctions.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in G.P. v. Jose Hernandez Arevalo?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited a nonexistent federal case as authority; the error was identified by Turo and acknowledged by G.P., who replaced it with a California Court of Appeal decision. The court referred to the authority as apparently fabricated and did not impose sanctions. Outcome: The court noted the fabricated citation and declined to impose sanctions at that time.. G.P.’s opposition brief contained an apparently AI-fabricated citation to the nonexistent case Kader v. S. Fla. Maint., Inc., No. 22-cv-23224, 2023 WL 3578798 (S.D. Fla. May 22, 2023). Turo identified the error, and G.P.’s counsel did not dispute it, acknowledging the citation and replacing it with a California Court of Appeal decision. The court stated that the fabricated authority, together with repeated and unexcused missed deadlines, fell below the required standard of professional responsibility, but imposed no sanctions given the procedural posture.
- Why does G.P. v. Jose Hernandez Arevalo matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fake citations and trial with The court noted the fabricated citation and declined to impose sanctions at that time. in W.D. Washington. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about G.P. v. Jose Hernandez Arevalo?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this G.P. v. Jose Hernandez Arevalo summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.