G2 Ops, Inc.
GAO · Feb 13, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- GAO
- Record ID
- g2-ops-inc-2026-02-13
- Observed outcome
- The protest was denied and dismissed; counsel received a formal warning regarding the use of AI-generated citations.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The GAO issued a formal warning to counsel for G2 Ops, Inc. after counsel admitted to including fabricated case law citations in their filings. The GAO characterized these errors as indicative of unverified AI use and explicitly cautioned that future submissions of non-existent authority may lead to sanctions.
Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel's filing included citations to non-existent case law; GAO observed these citations bore the hallmarks of AI/LLM use, warned that reliance on AI without verification wastes parties' and GAO's time, and advised that future submissions may lead to sanctions.
GAO has now put the bar on notice: next AI-hallucinated bid protest filing risks sanctions, not warnings.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Administrative
- Trial
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Admitted
- Recorded tool
- Large-language model or other artificial intelligence (AI)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Bid protest before the GAO; the protest was denied in part and dismissed in part, with a concurrent warning issued to counsel regarding the use of AI-generated citations.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The GAO identified the citations as having hallmarks of a large-language model or other AI.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
- Set a written rule for permissible AI use and mandatory verification.