Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 86/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Matter of: Adapt Forward, LLC
GAO · Feb 18, 2026
/ federalEditorial impact: lowfake citationsadministrativetrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Protester cited 'SRA Int’l, Inc.' with an inaccurate B-number/date; GAO found the original citation inaccurate and the revised citation inapposite. Outcome: Warning.
- Why the court cared
- Fabricated: Case Law | Protester cited 'SRA Int’l, Inc.' with an inaccurate B-number/date; GAO found the original citation inaccurate and the revised citation inapposite. || Fabricated: Case Law | Protester cited 'Boeing Sikorsky Aircraft Support' with an incorrect B-number/date; GAO could not locate the cited decision and requested corrected citations. || Fabricated: Case Law | Protester cited 'Caci, Inc.' with an inaccurate B-number/date; GAO noted the citation did not correctly identify the decision.
- Why it matters now
- GAO bid protest cites must be pulled from primary source B-numbers, not AI summaries, before filing.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Protester cited 'SRA Int’l, Inc.' with an inaccurate B-number/date; GAO found the original citation inaccurate and the revised citation inapposite. Outcome: Warning.
Operational lesson
GAO bid protest cites must be pulled from primary source B-numbers, not AI summaries, before filing.
Record details
CourtGAO
Jurisdictionfederal
CircuitNot recorded
DateFeb 18, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeWarning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Warning
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Protester cited 'SRA Int’l, Inc.' with an inaccurate B-number/date; GAO found the original citation inaccurate and the revised citation inapposite.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Protester cited 'Boeing Sikorsky Aircraft Support' with an incorrect B-number/date; GAO could not locate the cited decision and requested corrected citations.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Protester cited 'Caci, Inc.' with an inaccurate B-number/date; GAO noted the citation did not correctly identify the decision.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Matter of: Adapt Forward, LLC?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Protester cited 'SRA Int’l, Inc.' with an inaccurate B-number/date; GAO found the original citation inaccurate and the revised citation inapposite. Outcome: Warning.
- Why does Matter of: Adapt Forward, LLC matter for legal AI risk?
- GAO bid protest cites must be pulled from primary source B-numbers, not AI summaries, before filing.
- What does the public record establish about Matter of: Adapt Forward, LLC?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this Matter of: Adapt Forward, LLC summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.