Goins v. Father Flanagan's Boys Home
D. Nebraska · Jun 5, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- D. Nebraska
- Record ID
- goins-v-father-flanagans-boys-home-2025-06-05
- Observed outcome
- Warning
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Outcome: Warning. " This Court's local rules permit the use of generative artificial intelligence programs, but all parties, including pro se parties, must certify “that to the extent such a program was used, a human signatory of the document verified the accuracy of all generated text, including all citations and legal authority,” NECivR 7.1(d)(4)(B). The plaintiff's brief contains no such certification, nor does the plaintiff deny using artificial intelligence. See filing 27 at 9.From the Court's review of the plaintiff's brief, most citations are not hallucinatory. But the plaintiff undeniably cites to cases that do not support the stated legal proposition.…
The linked record identifies pro se and trial and records Warning. This page does not infer judicial reasoning beyond the source.
This matter connects pro se and trial involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in D. Nebraska, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Trial
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Warning
leagle.com
Secondary or other linked source. The recorded link is not classified as an official court source or docket mirror.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded link is a secondary or other public source and should be checked against the docket where available. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Latest evidence review: Source Unavailable (medium confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Apply the same source-checking controls to AI (implied, unspecified) output as to any other research input.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.