AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Aug 9, 2026 · Latest decision Aug 6, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesGirija Kadlaskar v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Girija Kadlaskar v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services

D. Nebraska · Aug 6, 2026

NE / federalEditorial impact: lowfake citationsfabricated quotesimmigrationtrialWarning
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited a non-existent Eighth Circuit case 'Peterson v. U.S. Retirement Board, 785 F.2d 245' to support an EAJA proposition; the Court found the citation fabricated and traced the wording to a committee report quoted in Jackson v. Bowen. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records Warning. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Warning in D. Nebraska. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited a non-existent Eighth Circuit case 'Peterson v. U.S. Retirement Board, 785 F.2d 245' to support an EAJA proposition; the Court found the citation fabricated and traced the wording to a committee report quoted in Jackson v. Bowen. Outcome: Warning.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Warning in D. Nebraska. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

NebraskaSingle-state evidence scope
Explore NEOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtD. Nebraska
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit8th Circuit
DateAug 6, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeWarning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited a non-existent Eighth Circuit case 'Peterson v. U.S. Retirement Board, 785 F.2d 245' to support an EAJA proposition; the Court found the citation fabricated and traced the wording to a committee report quoted in Jackson v. Bowen.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Girija Kadlaskar v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services?
Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited a non-existent Eighth Circuit case 'Peterson v. U.S. Retirement Board, 785 F.2d 245' to support an EAJA proposition; the Court found the citation fabricated and traced the wording to a committee report quoted in Jackson v. Bowen. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Girija Kadlaskar v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Warning in D. Nebraska. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Girija Kadlaskar v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Girija Kadlaskar v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Leber v. Bryan Medical Center et al.D. Nebraska · Dec 23, 2025same court · fake citations + trialStrong v. Rushmore Loan Management ServicesD. Nebraska · Jan 15, 2025same court · fake citations + trialGoins v. Father Flanagan's Boys HomeD. Nebraska · Jun 5, 2025same court · trialCatarina Almeida Porfirio v. Homeland Security, et al.D. D.C. · Jul 23, 2026fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Garibay-Robledo v. NoemN.D. Texas · Jan 9, 2026fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Ekeocha v. U.S. Department of StateD. DC · Nov 19, 2025fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)