Girija Kadlaskar v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0), which credits Jesse Schaefer; document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.
D. Nebraska · Aug 6, 2026
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited a non-existent Eighth Circuit case 'Peterson v. U.S. Retirement Board, 785 F.2d 245' to support an EAJA proposition; the Court found the citation fabricated and traced the wording to a committee report quoted in Jackson v. Bowen. Outcome: Warning: the court found a cited authority (785 F.2d 245) does not exist and another lacks the quoted language, and cautioned counsel about his duty of candor and Rule 11(b)(2) (2026 WL 2267773, PDF p. 4).
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records Warning: the court found a cited authority (785 F.2d 245) does not exist and another lacks the quoted language, and cautioned counsel about his duty of candor and Rule 11(b)(2) (2026 WL 2267773, PDF p. 4). The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Warning: the court found a cited authority (785 F.2d 245) does not exist and another lacks the quoted language, and cautioned counsel about his duty of candor and Rule 11(b)(2) (2026 WL 2267773, PDF p. 4) in D. Nebraska. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited a non-existent Eighth Circuit case 'Peterson v. U.S. Retirement Board, 785 F.2d 245' to support an EAJA proposition; the Court found the citation fabricated and traced the wording to a committee report quoted in Jackson v. Bowen. Outcome: Warning: the court found a cited authority (785 F.2d 245) does not exist and another lacks the quoted language, and cautioned counsel about his duty of candor and Rule 11(b)(2) (2026 WL 2267773, PDF p. 4).
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Warning: the court found a cited authority (785 F.2d 245) does not exist and another lacks the quoted language, and cautioned counsel about his duty of candor and Rule 11(b)(2) (2026 WL 2267773, PDF p. 4) in D. Nebraska. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
Corrected 2026-11-02: see the corrections log.
What the record establishes about AI use
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Warning: the court found a cited authority (785 F.2d 245) does not exist and another lacks the quoted language, and cautioned counsel about his duty of candor and Rule 11(b)(2) (2026 WL 2267773, PDF p. 4)
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited a non-existent Eighth Circuit case 'Peterson v. U.S. Retirement Board, 785 F.2d 245' to support an EAJA proposition; the Court found the citation fabricated and traced the wording to a committee report quoted in Jackson v. Bowen.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Girija Kadlaskar v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited a non-existent Eighth Circuit case 'Peterson v. U.S. Retirement Board, 785 F.2d 245' to support an EAJA proposition; the Court found the citation fabricated and traced the wording to a committee report quoted in Jackson v. Bowen. Outcome: Warning: the court found a cited authority (785 F.2d 245) does not exist and another lacks the quoted language, and cautioned counsel about his duty of candor and Rule 11(b)(2) (2026 WL 2267773, PDF p. 4).
- Why does Girija Kadlaskar v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Warning: the court found a cited authority (785 F.2d 245) does not exist and another lacks the quoted language, and cautioned counsel about his duty of candor and Rule 11(b)(2) (2026 WL 2267773, PDF p. 4) in D. Nebraska. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Girija Kadlaskar v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Girija Kadlaskar v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases
One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.