Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-02J0FR7Generated September 11, 2026Evidence checked Sep 10, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Green Building Initiative, Inc. v. Stephen R. Peacock & Green Globe Limited

D. Oregon · Oct 27, 2025

Jurisdiction
federal
Court
D. Oregon
Record ID
green-building-initiative-inc-v-stephen-r-peacock-green-globe-limited-2025-10-27
Observed outcome
Show Cause Order
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

Fabricated: Case Law | Mis-citation/misrepresentation of Page v. Parsons: GBI cited a federal reporter that does not correspond to that Oregon appellate decision and relied on it for a proposition the real Oregon decision does not support. Outcome: Show Cause Order. Lawyer later explained that he had "used Microsoft’s Copilot for its editing functions in an effort to review and improve the draft document by fixing grammar, spelling, and improving badly phrased sentences" - not for legal research.On November 12, 2025, the court resolved the Show Cause proceedings without formal sanctions.

Why the decision-maker cared

Fabricated: Case Law | Mis-citation/misrepresentation of Page v. Parsons: GBI cited a federal reporter that does not correspond to that Oregon appellate decision and relied on it for a proposition the real Oregon decision does not support. || Fabricated: Case Law | Entirely fabricated opinion and citation attributed to 'Stell v. Cardenas' (case and reporter do not exist; real Case No. 3:21-cv-413 is a different matter). Court found no such opinion at the cited Westlaw number or parties.

Why it matters now

Using Copilot for grammar edits still introduces hallucinated citations; ban AI touching any text containing case cites.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Fake Citations
  • Trial
  • None Adjudicated
AI attribution
Reported
Recorded tool
Copilot
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Show Cause Order
PRIMARY SOURCE

reason.com

Secondary or other linked source. The recorded link is not classified as an official court source or docket mirror.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

Copilot is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Latest evidence review: Secondary Source Only (medium confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
  2. Use only approved research and drafting tools for legal work.
  3. Retain a matter-level record of source checks and corrections.