HomeCasesMichael J. Cross v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Michael J. Cross v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al.

D. Oregon · Jun 29, 2026

OR / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsothertrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited "Stevens v. Paulson, 254 Or App 111 (2012)," which the Court found does not exist; the cited volume/page corresponds to State v. Barajas, 254 Or. App. 106 (2012). Court admonished reliance on fake opinions. Outcome: Admonishment.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Admonishment; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Admonishment in D. Oregon, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Admonishment in D. Oregon, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

OregonSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Oregon

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateJun 29, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeAdmonishment

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Admonishment

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited "Stevens v. Paulson, 254 Or App 111 (2012)," which the Court found does not exist; the cited volume/page corresponds to State v. Barajas, 254 Or. App. 106 (2012). Court admonished reliance on fake opinions.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Michael J. Cross v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al.?: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited "Stevens v. Paulson, 254 Or App 111 (2012)," which the Court found does not exist; the cited volume/page corresponds to State v. Barajas, 254 Or. App. 106 (2012). Court admonished reliance on fake opinions. Outcome: Admonishment.
Why does Michael J. Cross v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al. matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Admonishment in D. Oregon, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Michael J. Cross v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al.?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Michael J. Cross v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Troy Allen Berg v. Mandi Marie WondraD. Oregon · Dec 12, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Steven Nemec v. Kelsey Kanoelani Alao and Alyssa Jade AlaoD. Oregon · Apr 10, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Yves Hector Vimegnon v. Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc.D. Oregon · Mar 30, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Stafford v. Andrew Taffet, et al.D. Oregon · Mar 23, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Zack Jones v. Target CorporationD. Oregon · Mar 6, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations McNeal v. United Food and Commercial Workers Local 555; Safeway, Inc.D. Oregon · Jan 22, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Record details

OregonSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Oregon

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateJun 29, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeAdmonishment

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Michael J. Cross v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al.?

Why does Michael J. Cross v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al. matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Michael J. Cross v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al.?

Which source supports this Michael J. Cross v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.