Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-1TMODNKGenerated September 11, 2026Evidence checked Sep 10, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Groulx v. CSL Limited

CA Michigan · Dec 19, 2025

Jurisdiction
state
Court
CA Michigan
Record ID
groulx-v-csl-limited-2025-12-19
Observed outcome
Appeal dismissed; request for sanctions denied without prejudice.
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

The Michigan Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal because the appellant's brief cited two non-existent cases, violating court rules. The court denied the appellees' request for sanctions as procedurally improper but granted them leave to file a separate motion for vexatious proceedings.

Why the decision-maker cared

Fabricated: Case Law

Why it matters now

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CA Michigan, with the listed outcome: Appeal dismissed.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Pro Se
  • Fake Citations
  • Other
  • Appellate
  • Case Dismissed
AI attribution
Not Established
Recorded tool
Unidentified
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Appellate dismissal following a motion to dismiss for failure to conform to court rules.
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

The source document does not identify the tool used to generate the citations.

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.