Which source supports this Groulx v. CSL Limited summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

HomeCasesGroulx v. CSL Limited

Evidence review: primary document verified. The linked primary document was extracted and checked with page-level evidence locators.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passes the current publication gate; that is not a legal-editorial review or a guarantee that every field has been independently verified.

Corpus matter record

Groulx v. CSL Limited

CA Michigan · Dec 19, 2025

MI / state Editorial impact: low pro se fake citations other appellate Case Dismissed

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

The Michigan Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal because the appellant's brief cited two non-existent cases, violating court rules. The court denied the appellees' request for sanctions as procedurally improper but granted them leave to file a separate motion for vexatious proceedings.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law
Why it matters now: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CA Michigan, with the listed outcome: Appeal dismissed.

Why this matter is tracked

The Michigan Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal filed by a pro se litigant, Patrick Joseph Groulx, due to the inclusion of two non-existent cases in his appellant's brief. The court characterized this as an egregious failure to comply with court rules regarding the submission of legal authorities. While the court granted the motion to dismiss the appeal, it denied the appellees' request for sanctions as procedurally improper under MCR 7.211(C)(8). The court's order was issued without prejudice, allowing the appellees to file a separate, timely motion for sanctions for vexatious proceedings within 21 days of the dismissal order.

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CA Michigan, with the listed outcome: Appeal dismissed.

Record details

MichiganSingle-state evidence scope

Explore MIOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.

CourtCA Michigan

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit6th Circuit

DateDec 19, 2025

AI toolUnidentified

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeAppeal dismissed; request for sanctions denied without prejudice.

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The source document does not identify the tool used to generate the citations.

Procedural posture

Appellate dismissal following a motion to dismiss for failure to conform to court rules.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law

Questions this record answers

What happened in Groulx v. CSL Limited?: The Michigan Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal because the appellant's brief cited two non-existent cases, violating court rules. The court denied the appellees' request for sanctions as procedurally improper but granted them leave to file a separate motion for vexatious proceedings.
Why does Groulx v. CSL Limited matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CA Michigan, with the listed outcome: Appeal dismissed.
What does the public record establish about Groulx v. CSL Limited?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Groulx v. CSL Limited summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Eagle Township v. Shaun VanAlstineCA Michigan · Apr 30, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Joyce Barber v. Lawrence J. Morawa, MDCA Michigan · Jun 17, 2026same court · fake citations + appellate CH v BDCA Michigan · Jun 11, 2026same court · pro se + appellate Barber v. MorawaCA Michigan · May 5, 2026same court · fake citations + appellate Dineen/Shibata v. KotchkaCA Arizona (1d) · Jul 15, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified Boatner v. HickersonCA Missouri · Jun 2, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source Suggest a correction to this record

Public-record statuspublic record, not an allegation-only entry

Indexing eligibilitypublicly indexable with evidence status disclosed

Evidence-review statusprimary document verified

Published and maintained byManu Ayala · AI VortexIndependent legal AI risk intelligence

Evidence review recorded Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Sep 10, 2026; latest tracked decision Sep 8, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Open CA Michigan profile Explore jurisdiction

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology