Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Groulx v. CSL Limited
CA Michigan · Dec 19, 2025
MI / stateEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsotherappellate
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
The Michigan Court of Appeals dismissed Groulx’s appeal because his appellant’s brief cited two non-existent cases, which the court treated as an egregious failure to pursue the appeal in conformity with the court rules. The order denied the appellees’ sanctions request as procedurally improper, without prejudice to a timely vexatious-proceedings motion.
- Why the court cared
- Fabricated: Case Law
- Why it matters now
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CA Michigan, with the listed outcome: Appeal dismissed.
Why this matter is tracked
The Michigan Court of Appeals dismissed Groulx’s appeal because his appellant’s brief cited two non-existent cases, which the court treated as an egregious failure to pursue the appeal in conformity with the court rules. The order denied the appellees’ sanctions request as procedurally improper, without prejudice to a timely vexatious-proceedings motion.
Operational lesson
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CA Michigan, with the listed outcome: Appeal dismissed.
Record details
MichiganSingle-state evidence scope
CourtCA Michigan
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit6th Circuit
DateDec 19, 2025
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeAppeal dismissed
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
not established
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Procedural posture
Appeal dismissed
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Groulx v. CSL Limited?
- The Michigan Court of Appeals dismissed Groulx’s appeal because his appellant’s brief cited two non-existent cases, which the court treated as an egregious failure to pursue the appeal in conformity with the court rules. The order denied the appellees’ sanctions request as procedurally improper, without prejudice to a timely vexatious-proceedings motion.
- Why does Groulx v. CSL Limited matter for legal AI risk?
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CA Michigan, with the listed outcome: Appeal dismissed.
- What does the public record establish about Groulx v. CSL Limited?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this Groulx v. CSL Limited summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.