Habbi Barry v Secretary of State for the Home Department
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) · Sep 3, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
- Record ID
- habbi-barry-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-2026-09-03
- Observed outcome
- None Adjudicated
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | The citation “CG v SSHD [2021] EWCA Civ 641” could not be located by either the Respondent or the Upper Tribunal, and the Appellant could not explain it. The Respondent presumed it was the product of an AI hallucination.
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
naturalandartificiallaw.com
Secondary or other linked source. The recorded link is not classified as an official court source or docket mirror.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded link is a secondary public source and should be checked against the docket where available. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.