AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Oct 29, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 23, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesHabbi Barry v Secretary of State for the Home Department
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 80/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Habbi Barry v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0), which credits Natural & Artificial Intelligence in Law; linked document: naturalandartificiallaw.com. What AI Vortex adds.

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) · Sep 3, 2026

GBEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationstrialNone Adjudicated
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | The citation “CG v SSHD [2021] EWCA Civ 641” could not be located by either the Respondent or the Upper Tribunal, and the Appellant could not explain it. The Respondent presumed it was the product of an AI hallucination.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | The citation “CG v SSHD [2021] EWCA Civ 641” could not be located by either the Respondent or the Upper Tribunal, and the Appellant could not explain it. The Respondent presumed it was the product of an AI hallucination.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtUpper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateSep 3, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeSee source
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | The citation “CG v SSHD [2021] EWCA Civ 641” could not be located by either the Respondent or the Upper Tribunal, and the Appellant could not explain it. The Respondent presumed it was the product of an AI hallucination.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Habbi Barry v Secretary of State for the Home Department?
Fabricated: Case Law | The citation “CG v SSHD [2021] EWCA Civ 641” could not be located by either the Respondent or the Upper Tribunal, and the Appellant could not explain it. The Respondent presumed it was the product of an AI hallucination.
Why does Habbi Barry v Secretary of State for the Home Department matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Habbi Barry v Secretary of State for the Home Department?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded link is a secondary public source and should be checked against the docket where available. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Habbi Barry v Secretary of State for the Home Department summary?
The recorded source is naturalandartificiallaw.com. It is classified as secondary or other linked source; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

NK (Namibia) v Secretary of State for the Home DepartmentUpper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) · Sep 21, 2026same court · fake citations + trialAS v Secretary of State for the Home DepartmentUpper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) · Jul 7, 2026same court · fake citations + trialUB v Secretary of State for the Home DepartmentUpper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) · Jun 18, 2025same court · fake citations + trialFJ v Secretary of State for the Home DepartmentFirst-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) · Oct 1, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Simpson v. PorterSC Arkansas · Oct 1, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Jackson v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.E.D. Michigan · Sep 30, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

This record involves a self-represented party. See all pro se litigant AI hallucination decisions in the corpus, with counts by year, country and outcome.

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.