Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-1VL7ENPGenerated September 11, 2026Evidence checked Sep 10, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Heneghan v. The Owners, Strata Plan 187

BC CRT · Dec 2, 2025

Jurisdiction
international
Court
BC CRT
Record ID
heneghan-v-the-owners-strata-plan-187-2025-12-02
Observed outcome
The tribunal dismissed the applicant's claims and refused to resolve a human rights claim due to lack of evidence.
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

The BC Civil Resolution Tribunal dismissed the applicant's claims after finding that three case citations submitted by the applicant were non-existent. The tribunal explicitly identified these citations as likely AI-generated 'hallucinations' and disregarded them in its analysis of the strata corporation's authority to remove personal property.

Why the decision-maker cared

Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant submitted a case citation in support of her argument; tribunal found the case does not exist and concluded it was likely an AI-generated fabrication. || Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant submitted a second case citation; tribunal determined this citation also does not exist and labeled it a likely AI 'hallucination.' || Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant submitted a third case citation; tribunal found no record of the case and treated it as an AI-generated fabricated authority.

Why it matters now

BC Civil Resolution Tribunal is explicitly labeling three-cite fabrications as 'AI hallucinations' in reasons — the record follows the litigant.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Pro Se
  • Fake Citations
  • Other
  • Trial
  • None Adjudicated
AI attribution
Explicitly Recorded
Recorded tool
Artificial Intelligence (unspecified)
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Adjudicated decision by the BC Civil Resolution Tribunal following a review of documentary evidence and written submissions.
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

The tribunal identified the citations as AI-generated hallucinations.

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.