HomeCasesHeneghan v. The Owners, Strata Plan 187

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Heneghan v. The Owners, Strata Plan 187

BC CRT · Dec 2, 2025

CanadaEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsothertrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant submitted a case citation in support of her argument; tribunal found the case does not exist and concluded it was likely an AI-generated fabrication.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant submitted a case citation in support of her argument; tribunal found the case does not exist and concluded it was likely an AI-generated fabrication. || Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant submitted a second case citation; tribunal determined this citation also does not exist and labeled it a likely AI 'hallucination.' || Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant submitted a third case citation; tribunal found no record of the case and treated it as an AI-generated fabricated authority.
Why it matters now: BC Civil Resolution Tribunal is explicitly labeling three-cite fabrications as 'AI hallucinations' in reasons — the record follows the litigant.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant submitted a case citation in support of her argument; tribunal found the case does not exist and concluded it was likely an AI-generated fabrication.

Operational lesson

BC Civil Resolution Tribunal is explicitly labeling three-cite fabrications as 'AI hallucinations' in reasons — the record follows the litigant.

Record details

CourtBC CRT

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateDec 2, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant submitted a case citation in support of her argument; tribunal found the case does not exist and concluded it was likely an AI-generated fabrication.
Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant submitted a second case citation; tribunal determined this citation also does not exist and labeled it a likely AI 'hallucination.'
Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant submitted a third case citation; tribunal found no record of the case and treated it as an AI-generated fabricated authority.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Heneghan v. The Owners, Strata Plan 187?: Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant submitted a case citation in support of her argument; tribunal found the case does not exist and concluded it was likely an AI-generated fabrication.
Why does Heneghan v. The Owners, Strata Plan 187 matter for legal AI risk?: BC Civil Resolution Tribunal is explicitly labeling three-cite fabrications as 'AI hallucinations' in reasons — the record follows the litigant.
What does the public record establish about Heneghan v. The Owners, Strata Plan 187?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Heneghan v. The Owners, Strata Plan 187 summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Wyszynski v. The Owners, Strata Plan BCS1721BC CRT · Jun 1, 2026same court · pro se + other Blanes v. Stellers Jay Academy Inc.BC CRT · May 28, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Margolles v. The Owners, Strata Plan VR 2477BC CRT · Apr 27, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Langen v. The Owners, Strata Plan EPS5455BC CRT · Apr 14, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations White v. The Owners, Strata Plan BCS3946BC CRT · Feb 27, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Rasko v. ICBCBC CRT · Jan 30, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant submitted a case citation in support of her argument; tribunal found the case does not exist and concluded it was likely an AI-generated fabrication.

Operational lesson

BC Civil Resolution Tribunal is explicitly labeling three-cite fabrications as 'AI hallucinations' in reasons — the record follows the litigant.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant submitted a case citation in support of her argument; tribunal found the case does not exist and concluded it was likely an AI-generated fabrication.

Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant submitted a second case citation; tribunal determined this citation also does not exist and labeled it a likely AI 'hallucination.'

Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant submitted a third case citation; tribunal found no record of the case and treated it as an AI-generated fabricated authority.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Heneghan v. The Owners, Strata Plan 187?

Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant submitted a case citation in support of her argument; tribunal found the case does not exist and concluded it was likely an AI-generated fabrication.

Why does Heneghan v. The Owners, Strata Plan 187 matter for legal AI risk?

BC Civil Resolution Tribunal is explicitly labeling three-cite fabrications as 'AI hallucinations' in reasons — the record follows the litigant.

What does the public record establish about Heneghan v. The Owners, Strata Plan 187?

Which source supports this Heneghan v. The Owners, Strata Plan 187 summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.