Henry v. Long Island University
E.D. New York · Sep 14, 2026
Short answer. Status: Two-year filing-disclosure sanction; amount: no amount stated. E.D. New York, decision date on record September 14, 2026. As of November 8, 2026. Court source · Methodology
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Court
- E.D. New York
- Record ID
- henry-v-long-island-university-2026-09-14
- Observed outcome
- Two-year filing-disclosure sanction
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Outdated Advice: Overturned Case Law | Counsel presented Kruchowski as a Second Circuit decision, but the cited case was from the Tenth Circuit and the opinion had been withdrawn and superseded by a 2006 revised opinion. Outcome: Two-year filing-disclosure sanction.
The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records Two-year filing-disclosure sanction. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Two-year filing-disclosure sanction in E.D. New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Employment
- Trial
- Professional
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- No tool named in source
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Two-year filing-disclosure sanction
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.