Public trackerCorpus refreshed Sep 24, 2026 · Latest decision Sep 23, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesHenry v. Long Island University
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Henry v. Long Island University

E.D. New York · Sep 14, 2026

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Outdated Advice: Overturned Case Law | Counsel presented Kruchowski as a Second Circuit decision, but the cited case was from the Tenth Circuit and the opinion had been withdrawn and superseded by a 2006 revised opinion. Outcome: Two-year filing-disclosure sanction.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records Two-year filing-disclosure sanction. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Two-year filing-disclosure sanction in E.D. New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Outdated Advice: Overturned Case Law | Counsel presented Kruchowski as a Second Circuit decision, but the cited case was from the Tenth Circuit and the opinion had been withdrawn and superseded by a 2006 revised opinion. Outcome: Two-year filing-disclosure sanction.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Two-year filing-disclosure sanction in E.D. New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

New YorkSingle-state evidence scope
Explore NYOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtE.D. New York
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit2nd Circuit
DateSep 14, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeTwo-year filing-disclosure sanction
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionYes
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Two-year filing-disclosure sanction

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

12 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Outdated Advice: Overturned Case Law | Counsel presented Kruchowski as a Second Circuit decision, but the cited case was from the Tenth Circuit and the opinion had been withdrawn and superseded by a 2006 revised opinion.
  2. Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited Nichols v. Princeton Int’l Ins. Agency, Inc. with a 2005 WL citation for a duress proposition. The cited WL number was a Senate Agriculture Committee testimony transcript, not the asserted case; counsel substituted Nicholas v. Nynex, Inc. as a correction.
  3. Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited Torrence v. Kuehne v. Nagel, Inc. as an E.D.N.Y. case, but the WL citation was a declaration filed in the Central District of California and the asserted case did not exist.
  4. Fabricated: Case Law | The court could not confirm the cited D.C. Circuit case existed; it found only a Northern District of Florida case with the same name.
  5. False Quotes: Case Law | Counsel attributed the statement that exhaustion is satisfied by timely filing an EEOC charge to Williams, but the quoted language does not appear in that decision.
  6. Fabricated: Case Law | The court could not confirm that the cited Loewen decision existed.
  7. False Quotes: Case Law | Counsel attributed a strict-compliance quotation concerning the ADEA to Butcher, but the quoted language does not appear in that decision.
  8. Fabricated: Case Law | The court could not confirm that the cited Stewart decision existed.
Show 4 additional discrepancies
  1. False Quotes: Case Law | Counsel attributed a duress and prompt-repudiation quotation to VKK, but the quoted language does not appear in that decision.
  2. Fabricated: Case Law | The court could not confirm that the cited Proformance decision existed; it found only a Supreme Court of New Jersey case with the same name.
  3. Fabricated: Case Law | The court could not confirm that the cited Jiggetts decision existed.
  4. Fabricated: Case Law | The court could not confirm the incomplete citation to Scheuer v. Trustees of CUNY.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Henry v. Long Island University?
Outdated Advice: Overturned Case Law | Counsel presented Kruchowski as a Second Circuit decision, but the cited case was from the Tenth Circuit and the opinion had been withdrawn and superseded by a 2006 revised opinion. Outcome: Two-year filing-disclosure sanction.
Why does Henry v. Long Island University matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Two-year filing-disclosure sanction in E.D. New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Henry v. Long Island University?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Henry v. Long Island University summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.