Henry v. Long Island University
Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.
E.D. New York · Sep 14, 2026
What happened in this matter?
Outdated Advice: Overturned Case Law | Counsel presented Kruchowski as a Second Circuit decision, but the cited case was from the Tenth Circuit and the opinion had been withdrawn and superseded by a 2006 revised opinion. Outcome: Two-year filing-disclosure sanction.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records Two-year filing-disclosure sanction. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Two-year filing-disclosure sanction in E.D. New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Outdated Advice: Overturned Case Law | Counsel presented Kruchowski as a Second Circuit decision, but the cited case was from the Tenth Circuit and the opinion had been withdrawn and superseded by a 2006 revised opinion. Outcome: Two-year filing-disclosure sanction.
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Two-year filing-disclosure sanction in E.D. New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Two-year filing-disclosure sanction
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
12 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Outdated Advice: Overturned Case Law | Counsel presented Kruchowski as a Second Circuit decision, but the cited case was from the Tenth Circuit and the opinion had been withdrawn and superseded by a 2006 revised opinion.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited Nichols v. Princeton Int’l Ins. Agency, Inc. with a 2005 WL citation for a duress proposition. The cited WL number was a Senate Agriculture Committee testimony transcript, not the asserted case; counsel substituted Nicholas v. Nynex, Inc. as a correction.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited Torrence v. Kuehne v. Nagel, Inc. as an E.D.N.Y. case, but the WL citation was a declaration filed in the Central District of California and the asserted case did not exist.
- Fabricated: Case Law | The court could not confirm the cited D.C. Circuit case existed; it found only a Northern District of Florida case with the same name.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Counsel attributed the statement that exhaustion is satisfied by timely filing an EEOC charge to Williams, but the quoted language does not appear in that decision.
- Fabricated: Case Law | The court could not confirm that the cited Loewen decision existed.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Counsel attributed a strict-compliance quotation concerning the ADEA to Butcher, but the quoted language does not appear in that decision.
- Fabricated: Case Law | The court could not confirm that the cited Stewart decision existed.
Show 4 additional discrepancies
- False Quotes: Case Law | Counsel attributed a duress and prompt-repudiation quotation to VKK, but the quoted language does not appear in that decision.
- Fabricated: Case Law | The court could not confirm that the cited Proformance decision existed; it found only a Supreme Court of New Jersey case with the same name.
- Fabricated: Case Law | The court could not confirm that the cited Jiggetts decision existed.
- Fabricated: Case Law | The court could not confirm the incomplete citation to Scheuer v. Trustees of CUNY.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Henry v. Long Island University?
- Outdated Advice: Overturned Case Law | Counsel presented Kruchowski as a Second Circuit decision, but the cited case was from the Tenth Circuit and the opinion had been withdrawn and superseded by a 2006 revised opinion. Outcome: Two-year filing-disclosure sanction.
- Why does Henry v. Long Island University matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Two-year filing-disclosure sanction in E.D. New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Henry v. Long Island University?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Henry v. Long Island University summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases
One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.