Herzel Hagigi v. Official Receiver
Supreme Court · Dec 28, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Record ID
- herzel-hagigi-v-official-receiver-2025-12-28
- Observed outcome
- Appeal dismissed; appellant ordered to pay 5,000 ILS in costs to the state.
- Known monetary consequence
- ₪5,000
Why this matter warrants attention
The Israeli Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and imposed a monetary sanction of 5,000 ILS against the pro se litigant. The Court explicitly identified the inclusion of fabricated case law and statutory provisions, as well as embedded AI-generated prompts, as the basis for its criticism and the resulting costs order.
Fabricated: Case Law || Fabricated: Legal Norm || Misrepresented: Case Law
Israeli Supreme Court dismisses appeals with costs when fabricated authorities drive the argument.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Misrepresented Authority
- Bankruptcy
- Trial
- Monetary
- AI attribution
- Admitted
- Recorded tool
- Generative AI (unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- ₪5,000
- Procedural posture
- Appeal of a judicial disqualification decision dismissed by the Supreme Court of Israel.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The court identified text in the filing indicating AI-generated prompts.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.