HomeCasesHerzel Hagigi v. Official Receiver

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Herzel Hagigi v. Official Receiver

Supreme Court · Dec 28, 2025

IsraelEditorial impact: mediumpro sefake citationsmisrepresented authoritybankruptcy

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

In Herzel Hagigi v. Official Receiver, the Israeli Supreme Court dismissed an unrepresented litigant’s appeal concerning judicial disqualification in bankruptcy-related proceedings. The court found that most cited authorities were fictitious, with case numbers unrelated to the asserted rulings, and identified AI-prompt use in the appeal. It dismissed the appeal and ordered NIS 5,000 in costs to the state.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law || Fabricated: Legal Norm || Misrepresented: Case Law
Why it matters now: Israeli Supreme Court dismisses appeals with costs when fabricated authorities drive the argument.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Israeli Supreme Court dismisses appeals with costs when fabricated authorities drive the argument.

Record details

CourtSupreme Court

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateDec 28, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeAppeal dismissed, monetary sanction

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Appeal dismissed, monetary sanction

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law
Fabricated: Legal Norm
Misrepresented: Case Law

Questions this record answers

What happened in Herzel Hagigi v. Official Receiver?: In Herzel Hagigi v. Official Receiver, the Israeli Supreme Court dismissed an unrepresented litigant’s appeal concerning judicial disqualification in bankruptcy-related proceedings. The court found that most cited authorities were fictitious, with case numbers unrelated to the asserted rulings, and identified AI-prompt use in the appeal. It dismissed the appeal and ordered NIS 5,000 in costs to the state.
Why does Herzel Hagigi v. Official Receiver matter for legal AI risk?: Israeli Supreme Court dismisses appeals with costs when fabricated authorities drive the argument.
What does the public record establish about Herzel Hagigi v. Official Receiver?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Herzel Hagigi v. Official Receiver summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Chen v. Goodmore Investments & TawaSupreme Court · May 1, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Jones v. Family Court at WhangareiSupreme Court · Feb 11, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Gummadi Usha Rani & Anr. v. Sure Mallikarjuna Rao & Anr.Supreme Court · Feb 27, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Husni Al Qawasmi Association et al. v. Ziad Oweisat (Sharfi) et al.Supreme Court · Jan 1, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Tsafrir v. GoldbergSupreme Court · Dec 14, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations In re Nicholia Cherry-CrocketteD. New Jersey (Bankruptcy) · May 20, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Israeli Supreme Court dismisses appeals with costs when fabricated authorities drive the argument.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Herzel Hagigi v. Official Receiver?

Why does Herzel Hagigi v. Official Receiver matter for legal AI risk?

Israeli Supreme Court dismisses appeals with costs when fabricated authorities drive the argument.

What does the public record establish about Herzel Hagigi v. Official Receiver?

Which source supports this Herzel Hagigi v. Official Receiver summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.