I OSK 935/26
NSA · Aug 27, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- NSA
- Record ID
- i-osk-935-26-2026-08-27
- Observed outcome
- The NSA dismissed the cassation appeal and criticized the professional lawyer's unverified AI-generated arguments as gross negligence; no separate sanction was imposed.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Misrepresented: Legal Norm | The appeal attributed the principle of two-instance administrative proceedings to Article 35 of the Code of Administrative Procedure, although Article 35 concerns statutory deadlines for resolving administrative matters; the principle is provided by Article 15. Outcome: The NSA dismissed the cassation appeal and criticized the professional lawyer's unverified AI-generated arguments as gross negligence; no separate sanction was imposed.. The NSA identified several apparently AI-generated errors in the cassation appeal: Article 35 of the Code of Administrative Procedure was cited as establishing the two-instance principle instead of governing decision deadlines; Article 87 of that Code was wrongly described as concerning representation after a party's death; Article 12 of the Civil Code was falsely attributed a principle concerning respect for deceased persons and succession; and the appeal invoked a nonexistent 17 June 2004 statute on social-assistance proceedings. The court held that these were not merely drafting errors, regarded the lawyer's failure to verify the AI-generated content as gross negligence, and dismissed the appeal on the merits because it lacked valid grounds.
The structured public record identifies fake citations and misrepresented authority and records The NSA dismissed the cassation appeal and criticized the professional lawyer's unverified AI-generated arguments as gross negligence; no separate sanction was imposed.. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority with The NSA dismissed the cassation appeal and criticized the professional lawyer's unverified AI-generated arguments as gross negligence; no separate sanction was imposed. in NSA. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Misrepresented Authority
- Trial
- Case Dismissed
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- The NSA dismissed the cassation appeal and criticized the professional lawyer's unverified AI-generated arguments as gross negligence; no separate sanction was imposed.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.