AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Oct 9, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 8, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesI OSK 590/26
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

I OSK 590/26

NSA · Aug 31, 2026

PolandEditorial impact: lowfake citationsmisrepresented authorityadministrativetrialNone Adjudicated
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Misrepresented: Case Law | The appeal cited an NSA judgment said to have been issued on 7 March 2023, but the decision with that case number was actually issued on 20 December 2024 and concerned compensation for real property, not the issue in this case. Outcome: Authorities disregarded.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies fake citations and misrepresented authority and records Authorities disregarded. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority with Authorities disregarded in NSA. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Misrepresented: Case Law | The appeal cited an NSA judgment said to have been issued on 7 March 2023, but the decision with that case number was actually issued on 20 December 2024 and concerned compensation for real property, not the issue in this case. Outcome: Authorities disregarded.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority with Authorities disregarded in NSA. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtNSA
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateAug 31, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeAuthorities disregarded
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Authorities disregarded

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

7 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Misrepresented: Case Law | The appeal cited an NSA judgment said to have been issued on 7 March 2023, but the decision with that case number was actually issued on 20 December 2024 and concerned compensation for real property, not the issue in this case.
  2. Fabricated: Case Law | The appeal cited an NSA case that was not registered under the stated docket number.
  3. Misrepresented: Case Law | The appeal cited an NSA judgment as dated 18 January 2024, but the case was actually decided on 16 April 2026 and concerned restriction of the use of real property.
  4. Misrepresented: Case Law | The appeal cited an NSA judgment as dated 12 April 2023, but the case was actually decided on 12 October 2023 and concerned excessive delay in administrative proceedings.
  5. Misrepresented: Case Law | The appeal cited an NSA judgment as dated 16 May 2024, but the case was actually decided on 3 July 2025 and concerned refusal to commence proceedings concerning restitution of a property share.
  6. Fabricated: Case Law | The appeal cited an NSA case that was not registered under the stated docket number.
  7. Misrepresented: Case Law | The appeal cited an NSA judgment as dated 20 February 2024, but the case was actually decided on 28 May 2026 and concerned refusal of compensation for real property.

Questions this record answers

What happened in I OSK 590/26?
Misrepresented: Case Law | The appeal cited an NSA judgment said to have been issued on 7 March 2023, but the decision with that case number was actually issued on 20 December 2024 and concerned compensation for real property, not the issue in this case. Outcome: Authorities disregarded.
Why does I OSK 590/26 matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority with Authorities disregarded in NSA. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about I OSK 590/26?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this I OSK 590/26 summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

I OSK 935/26NSA · Aug 27, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authorityIn the Matter of Gary Brown, Jr.AC Maryland · Oct 8, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Miller v. Colorado Department of RevenueD. Colorado · Sep 30, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Perry v. Social Security Administration, CommissionerN.D. Alabama · Aug 3, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)The JAAW Group, LLCGAO · Jul 31, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)14095863 Canada Inc v Moosehead Breweries LimitedTrademarks Opposition Board · Jul 3, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)