I SA/Go 210/26
WSA w Gorzowie Wielkopolskim · Sep 3, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- WSA w Gorzowie Wielkopolskim
- Record ID
- i-sa-go-210-26-2026-09-03
- Observed outcome
- Admonishment
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
False Quotes: Case Law | The filing falsely attributed to NSA case I FSK 1142/19 a proposition that 100% prepayment eliminates economic grounds for finding inadequate diligence and that the supplier need not investigate the payer’s accounts or country. The court found that this quotation did not appear in the cited judgment or any other judgment. Outcome: Admonishment.
The structured public record identifies fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority and records Admonishment. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority with Admonishment in WSA w Gorzowie Wielkopolskim. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fabricated Quotes
- Misrepresented Authority
- Administrative
- Trial
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Admonishment
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.