AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Oct 9, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 8, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesI SA/Go 210/26
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

I SA/Go 210/26

WSA w Gorzowie Wielkopolskim · Sep 3, 2026

PolandEditorial impact: lowfabricated quotesmisrepresented authorityadministrativetrialWarning
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

False Quotes: Case Law | The filing falsely attributed to NSA case I FSK 1142/19 a proposition that 100% prepayment eliminates economic grounds for finding inadequate diligence and that the supplier need not investigate the payer’s accounts or country. The court found that this quotation did not appear in the cited judgment or any other judgment. Outcome: Admonishment.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority and records Admonishment. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority with Admonishment in WSA w Gorzowie Wielkopolskim. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

False Quotes: Case Law | The filing falsely attributed to NSA case I FSK 1142/19 a proposition that 100% prepayment eliminates economic grounds for finding inadequate diligence and that the supplier need not investigate the payer’s accounts or country. The court found that this quotation did not appear in the cited judgment or any other judgment. Outcome: Admonishment.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority with Admonishment in WSA w Gorzowie Wielkopolskim. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtWSA w Gorzowie Wielkopolskim
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateSep 3, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeAdmonishment
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Admonishment

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. False Quotes: Case Law | The filing falsely attributed to NSA case I FSK 1142/19 a proposition that 100% prepayment eliminates economic grounds for finding inadequate diligence and that the supplier need not investigate the payer’s accounts or country. The court found that this quotation did not appear in the cited judgment or any other judgment.
  2. Misrepresented: Case Law | The filing described NSA case I FSK 1142/19 as a 5 July 2023 decision involving a factually identical situation. The court verified that it was actually decided on 19 September 2019 and concerned only the incidental issue of extending the deadline for a VAT refund.
  3. False Quotes: Case Law | The court stated that other judgments cited in the filing were also presented with purported quotations that did not in fact appear in those decisions, although it gave I FSK 1142/19 as the detailed example.

Questions this record answers

What happened in I SA/Go 210/26?
False Quotes: Case Law | The filing falsely attributed to NSA case I FSK 1142/19 a proposition that 100% prepayment eliminates economic grounds for finding inadequate diligence and that the supplier need not investigate the payer’s accounts or country. The court found that this quotation did not appear in the cited judgment or any other judgment. Outcome: Admonishment.
Why does I SA/Go 210/26 matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority with Admonishment in WSA w Gorzowie Wielkopolskim. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about I SA/Go 210/26?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this I SA/Go 210/26 summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Miller v. Colorado Department of RevenueD. Colorado · Sep 30, 2026fabricated quotes + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Coyne v. SmurlLackawanna CCCP · Sep 25, 2026fabricated quotes + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)14095863 Canada Inc v Moosehead Breweries LimitedTrademarks Opposition Board · Jul 3, 2026fabricated quotes + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Chilly Moose Ltd. v Moosehead Breweries LimitedTrademarks Opposition Board · Jun 29, 2026fabricated quotes + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Moosehead Breweries Limited v 14095863 Canada Inc.Trademarks Opposition Board · Jun 29, 2026fabricated quotes + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)K.W. v. Ringwood Board of EducationD. New Jersey · Jun 16, 2026fabricated quotes + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)