Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-0D9PH1YGenerated August 19, 2026Evidence checked Aug 19, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

In re Marriage of Rebekah Muriel and Johnathan David Farris

CA Washington · Aug 18, 2026

Jurisdiction
state
Court
CA Washington
Record ID
in-re-marriage-of-rebekah-muriel-and-johnathan-david-farris-2026-08-18
Observed outcome
Adverse Costs Order
Known monetary consequence
$1
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent's brief twice cited a nonexistent case 'Marriage of Sanjuan'; appellant identified the error; court concluded it was an AI hallucination and treated the filing as frivolous. Outcome: Adverse Costs Order.

Why the decision-maker cared

The structured public record identifies fake citations and family and records Adverse Costs Order. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.

Why it matters now

This matter connects fake citations and family with Adverse Costs Order in CA Washington. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Fake Citations
  • Family
  • Appellate
  • Monetary
AI attribution
Reported
Recorded tool
AI (implied, unspecified)
Known monetary consequence
$1
Procedural posture
Adverse Costs Order
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
  2. Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.