AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Aug 19, 2026 · Latest decision Aug 18, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesIn re Marriage of Rebekah Muriel and Johnathan David Farris
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

In re Marriage of Rebekah Muriel and Johnathan David Farris

CA Washington · Aug 18, 2026

WA / stateEditorial impact: mediumfake citationsfamilyappellateMonetary
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent's brief twice cited a nonexistent case 'Marriage of Sanjuan'; appellant identified the error; court concluded it was an AI hallucination and treated the filing as frivolous. Outcome: Adverse Costs Order.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies fake citations and family and records Adverse Costs Order. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects fake citations and family with Adverse Costs Order in CA Washington. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent's brief twice cited a nonexistent case 'Marriage of Sanjuan'; appellant identified the error; court concluded it was an AI hallucination and treated the filing as frivolous. Outcome: Adverse Costs Order.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and family with Adverse Costs Order in CA Washington. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

WashingtonSingle-state evidence scope
Explore WAOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtCA Washington
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit9th Circuit
DateAug 18, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeAdverse Costs Order
Known amount$1
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Adverse Costs Order

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent's brief twice cited a nonexistent case 'Marriage of Sanjuan'; appellant identified the error; court concluded it was an AI hallucination and treated the filing as frivolous.

Questions this record answers

What happened in In re Marriage of Rebekah Muriel and Johnathan David Farris?
Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent's brief twice cited a nonexistent case 'Marriage of Sanjuan'; appellant identified the error; court concluded it was an AI hallucination and treated the filing as frivolous. Outcome: Adverse Costs Order.
Why does In re Marriage of Rebekah Muriel and Johnathan David Farris matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects fake citations and family with Adverse Costs Order in CA Washington. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about In re Marriage of Rebekah Muriel and Johnathan David Farris?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this In re Marriage of Rebekah Muriel and Johnathan David Farris summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

In re the Marriage of YoungCA Washington · Jul 9, 2026same court · fake citations + familyMatthew Merz v. Harlyn Jenkins, Jillane Baros, Melinda Finn‑KamerathCA Washington · Jun 15, 2026same court · fake citations + appellateArthur West v. Lower Duwamish Waterway GroupCA Washington · Apr 20, 2026same court · fake citations + appellateIn the Matter of the Estate of CAROL M. CAREYCA Washington · Mar 3, 2026same court · fake citations + appellatePut A Bird On It, LLC v. Seattle Arena Holdings, LLCCA Washington · Mar 2, 2026same court · fake citations + appellateGregory Richmond and Lynne Richmond v. City of Newport, WashingtonCA Washington (d3) · Mar 17, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + appellate