In re: Pamela Williams
N.D. Georgia (Bankruptcy) · Oct 30, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- N.D. Georgia (Bankruptcy)
- Record ID
- in-re-pamela-williams-2025-10-30
- Observed outcome
- The court denied the debtor's motion to reconsider.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court identified a fabricated case citation in a pro se debtor's filing, characterizing it as a likely AI 'hallucination.' While the court noted the error and referenced other cases where sanctions were imposed for similar conduct, it did not impose sanctions in this specific instance, denying the motion on other legal grounds.
Fabricated: Case Law | Debtor cited 'White v. Bank of America, 291 Ga. 367 (2012)'; the Court was unable to locate this case and described the citation as incorrect and possibly the product of an AI 'hallucination.'
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in N.D. Georgia (Bankruptcy), with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
Failure modes and consequences
- Hallucinated_case_law
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Bankruptcy
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Implied
- Recorded tool
- unspecified
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Order denying debtor's motion to reconsider an order denying a motion to strike.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The court refers to AI hallucination without naming a specific tool.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.